::: "Wild rhetoric" is an irrelevent criticism, unless one can manufacture some pressing reason requiring that information about "terror from the big capitalists" be presented in a sugar-coated manner. And sugar-coating one's discussion of such "terror" would beg the question of whether one is offering said capitalists an alibi for their deeds.::: The point of the above tedious inspection of the requirements for intellectual dignity is to show that, in a rational debate, this would be a mere preface to the actual inspection of Frode Areskjold's claims. Instead, I expect that not much more will be accomplished.
That's certainly true. In your own special way you deem me incapable
or unwilling to objectively investigate Frode's claims. Your right about me being unwilling. I have no interest at all in pursuing the
facts of this with a rabid liberal bigot. That was the point
of my first post.
"My ideological enemies are genocidal thugs who kill 40 million people
a year. Care to have a rational debate?" Good one guys! Ad
hominem is all there is sometimes.
Stuart Gort
