Day 131 - 06 Jun 95 - Page 50


     
     1   MS. STEEL:  Perhaps the staff should be paid "danger money" for
     2        a more dangerous job.
     3
     4   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  We have to establish it is dangerous first,
     5        and that brings us back to the point I am trying to make,
     6        that it surely has to be something you can compare
     7        McDonald's with.
     8
     9   THE WITNESS:  If I may say so, my Lord, that specific thinking
    10        is something that was rooted out in industry many years
    11        ago:  you do not pay people "danger money"; you reduce the
    12        danger.  That is a very obvious statement.
    13
    14   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  You take my point, surely, Mr. Morris?  If
    15        this leaflet had said that there is a greater incidence of
    16        accidents at McDonald's than there is at the banking
    17        industry, I do not suppose McDonald's for a moment would
    18        think that that was a libel issue.  It is too obvious to be
    19        true, that it is bound to be so.
    20
    21        If you are trying to show that the incidence of accidents
    22        (such as it may appear from the evidence which we have) is
    23        high in McDonald's in relation to comparable work, then
    24        I suggest you put the comparable work to Mr. Purslow and
    25        see if he can help you.  But it ought to be comparable
    26        work.
    27
    28   MR. MORRIS:  I think it is comparable to retailing.
    29
    30   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  (To the witness)  Is it comparable to
    31        retailing?
    32        A.  In no way, my Lord.  With retailing, you are not
    33        actually preparing anything.  All you are doing is taking
    34        goods in and passing them on to a customer.  The essence of
    35        the food industry is, obviously, that you are preparing
    36        food, which is why I compared it with the food
    37        manufacturing industry where they do exactly the same
    38        thing, but on a bigger scale.
    39
    40   MS. STEEL:  Can I say, in terms of what is in the leaflet
    41        itself, "Workers in catering do badly in terms of pay and
    42        conditions", then in terms of what is available to the kind
    43        of people who would be likely to get a job at McDonald's,
    44        retailing is an ideal contrast, because that is
    45        exactly -- and that was -----
    46
    47   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I do not want you to push at open doors, that
    48        is all.  You do not have to ask Mr. Purslow whether there
    49        is going to be a greater rate of accidents in a restaurant
    50        where, for instance, you have hot kitchen equipment, sharp 
    51        knives (although that does not apply to McDonald's) and wet 
    52        and greasy substances which may be dropped on the floor, 
    53        and where people are moving around all the time, compared
    54        with either banking or someone standing, moderately mobile,
    55        behind a counter, waiting for an enquiry from a customer.
    56
    57        If there is more to it than the obvious, such as a point
    58        you want to make, then put that to Mr. Purslow.
    59
    60   MR. MORRIS:  (To the witness)  In terms of the sorts of jobs

Prev Next Index