Day 115 - 06 Apr 95 - Page 22
1 -- on day 20 which is 28th July, on page 71, starting at
2 line 6 -- he actually said he is not 100 per cent certain
3 that they did not regain consciousness or that they might
4 have done.
5
6 THE WITNESS: Can I say, my Lord, that I understood
7 Mr. Rampton's question to go up to the point where they
8 were in the collecting area.
9
10 MR. RAMPTON: That is right.
11
12 THE WITNESS: Prior to stunning.
13
14 MR. RAMPTON: I had gone up to the collecting area and I had
15 gone into the stunning pen. I was dealing, my Lord, as
16 Ms. Steel ought to have understood and I think Dr. Long
17 did, with the way in which the pigs are handled. I started
18 by saying that he will have noticed that it is usually done
19 in groups of three or more often two.
20
21 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Let us carry on.
22
23 MR. RAMPTON: I do not believe it can have been much clearer.
24 (To the witness): There is one mistake I think you have
25 just made (or it may not have been a mistake, I do not
26 know), Dr. Long, you said that until recently it had been
27 recommended by the Farm Animal Welfare Council, amongst
28 others, that animals should be stunned singularly; that is
29 not right, is it?
30 A. What I understand is the recommendation that they
31 should be killed, and this is a word that one could play
32 with, perhaps, because there are two operations in most
33 cases, stunning and sticking. But if you take the word
34 "killed" for the moment, they should not be killed within
35 sight of one another. This has always been, if I might use
36 the word, a bone of contention and difficulty with pigs.
37
38 It is now being more accepted that with certain animals,
39 possibly with pigs, and in certain circumstances there may
40 be less stress if the animals are done singularly or in
41 groups, but not too big a group. In my experience, in
42 looking at this, because we have had a lot of experience,
43 but I have to say that this has been looked at particularly
44 with deer latterly. That is not exactly relevant to this
45 case except that, of course, we try to derive the all the
46 information we can from all species.
47
48 Q. The law is that cows or steers or heifers, or whatever,
49 cattle, must be stunned singularly, is it not?
50 A. They must be killed, as I understand it. Again, I did
51 not have (indecipherable) of all of this but, as
52 I understand it, they have to be killed out of sight of one
53 another. Now, if you take killing to embrace both stunning
54 and sticking, that is one thing. If you take the sticking
55 as being the killing, because the stunning, it might be
56 argued, does not actually kill the animal, then one would
57 have to argue that through and I think it is debatable.
58
59 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Effectively, if you are using a captive bolt
60 pistol, if the provision is that one animal is not killed