Day 115 - 06 Apr 95 - Page 12


     
     1
     2   MR. RAMPTON:  Describe your experience of electrocuting, is it,
     3        wet dogs?
     4        A.  No, it is done in a different way with dogs.
     5
     6   Q.   What is the method?
     7        A.  They were put into what was called electrothamator
     8        which is a box.  They were electrocuted more in the way of
     9         -- in McDonald's information indicates that the animals
    10        are electrocuted in China and Russia.
    11
    12   Q.   Sorry, I do not understand what -----
    13
    14   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Mr. Rampton, does it really matter?  I have
    15        quite enough information on pigs when I am concerned with
    16        pigs, without dogs and men in electric chairs and so on.
    17
    18   MR. RAMPTON:  That is why I raised it and that is why I asked
    19        the question, because if an expert is to give evidence on
    20        the basis of his experience, my Lord, then it has to be,
    21        I would respectfully submit, experience which has some
    22        relevance to the matters arising in the case.
    23
    24   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Yes.
    25
    26   MR. RAMPTON (To the witness):  Did you notice what Mr. Ashley
    27        Bowes had to say about the use of nose rings for sows in
    28        the field?
    29        A.  I did.
    30
    31   Q.   Do you accept that that is a proper purpose for which to
    32        put rings in the noses of sows?
    33        A.  Well, no, I think that it is mutilation.  It limits the
    34        sows foraging and nudging and digging interest.  It is a
    35        great restraint.  It is very easy to be anthropomorphic and
    36        think, oh, well, if you had a ring through your nose, what
    37        difference would it make?  But if that organ is your prime
    38        interest in life, that is going to be a considerable
    39        restraint.
    40
    41        Obviously, if the animal is in imperfect conditions, that
    42        it has not adapted to properly, there are mutilations that,
    43        if you like, reduce the stress because the sows do not
    44        really understand how they should adapt, so it is
    45        imperfect.  I can see the reason for it and I can see that
    46        in those imperfect conditions it may be necessary, like
    47        other mutilations.
    48
    49   Q.   Explain what is imperfect about an insulated farrowing arc
    50        in a field in Norfolk? 
    51        A.  Oh, I was talking about the nose ring. 
    52 
    53   Q.   No, no, the reason is, is it not, Dr. Long, that Mr. Bowes
    54        and his brother want to avoid too high a piglet mortality
    55        or keeping it as low as they can by preventing the sow from
    56        digging too deep a nest into which the piglets may fall and
    57        be suffocated of squashed ---
    58        A.  Yes.
    59
    60   Q.   That is the reason, is it not?  Tell me about the

Prev Next Index