Day 077 - 25 Jan 95 - Page 10


     
     1        have been heard, then there is maybe a reluctance to recall
     2        or wish to recall or have a situation where they might have
     3        to be recalled.  I think that -----
     4
     5   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  It is entirely up to you.  I have to say if
     6        it is allowed into the case as an issue, it is a pretty
     7        discreet issue, and by which I mean you can draw a defined
     8        line around it.  There is no reason why witnesses should
     9        not come back.  One would like to avoid that in any case,
    10        but we have gone long past the stage where we are avoiding
    11        that in this case.  I think, I have not made up my mind,
    12        but the first step you are going to have do in
    13        demonstrating that it is relevant in some way is sit down
    14        and say:  "Well, this is the way we would plead it".  Quite
    15        frankly, you are in no position to do that this morning,
    16        are you?
    17
    18   MR. MORRIS:  Not properly, no.  Without arguing the whole point,
    19        which we could do, but maybe it is better not to, our basic
    20        position would be it is under the heading of "meat and its
    21        relationship with disease".  I do not mean disease because
    22        of diet, I mean disease because of food poisoning.
    23
    24   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I think you should, quite frankly, reserve
    25        your argument on this.  I have not made up my mind but
    26        I make it quite clear to you I am finding it very difficult
    27        at the moment to see where it comes into a leaflet which
    28        mentions certain specific diseases.  It mentions buildup of
    29        certain specified drugs or substances in animals' tissues
    30        which can damage the health of people on a meat-based
    31        diet.  It mentions food poisoning, and I do not see at the
    32        moment BSC coming into any of those categories.
    33
    34        It is clearly not in the realm of antibiotics, growth
    35        promoting hormone drugs or pesticides.  It is not one of
    36        the named diseases.  I would not see it as being, since it
    37        is an encephalopothy, food poisoning.  I will listen to
    38        carefully to any argument you present, but if you put me to
    39        a ruling, you may find yourselves in difficulty on it.  All
    40        I am doing is giving you the opportunity of going away and
    41        thinking about it and getting your argument in order and
    42        drafting some kind of pleading, perhaps with help from
    43        outside, I do not know.
    44
    45   MR. MORRIS:  We will have to take that course then.
    46
    47   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  But in the meantime we cannot touch on it
    48        because it is not part of the case yet.
    49
    50   MS. STEEL:  Can I just say, actually it has been brought up 
    51        already by Mr. Rampton; he questioned Mr. Gonzales about 
    52        it. 
    53
    54   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  At the moment there will not be one word
    55        about BSE in any judgment which I deliver in this case.  If
    56        it is brought into the case by an amendment which I allow,
    57        then we will hear evidence on it and, of course, I will
    58        deal with it in my judgment.  But one way or the other,
    59        there will be no comment about BSE on the evidence as it
    60        stands at this stage in the case even if it has been

Prev Next Index