Day 065 - 09 Dec 94 - Page 65


     
     1        nature.  We do not like to see ourselves as something being
     2        blown in the wind.
     3
     4   MR. RAMPTON:  Can I summarise your criticisms in this way?
     5        A.  I have not finished my criticisms.  Perhaps they are
     6        not ready for summary.
     7
     8   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Mr. Rampton came in because you did pause.
     9
    10   MR. RAMPTON:  If there is more, I will stand and listen to it.
    11        A.  I am sorry if I am taking my time on this but I believe
    12        it is extremely important and I appreciate your patience in
    13        hearing -----
    14
    15   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Carry on.  You need not make excuses.
    16        A.  I will try to do it as quickly as possible, but the
    17        more interruptions, the more difficult it is for me to do
    18        that and to keep my train of thought.  People seldom admit
    19        that they are likely to be influenced by others, especially
    20        advertising, for example.  Therefore, many people at the
    21        meeting were not at all surprised when the research that
    22        was set up in this way showed, apparently, the limited
    23        power of advertising.
    24
    25        Secondly, there were a number of criticisms that were
    26        expressed and concerns expressed about the classification
    27        of statements.  People were asked to articulate about food
    28        decision-making.  I am sure people have read this and know
    29        that that was what was going on in the study.  It was then
    30        up to the researchers to classify whether the families
    31        concerned had expressed, for example, concerns about health
    32        and nutrition.
    33
    34        Now, what was of concern when this research was presented,
    35        that in order for a statement to be classified as
    36        expressing a concern about health and nutrition, that those
    37        words actually had to be mentioned.  It was a very narrow,
    38        it was unnecessarily narrow and, therefore, set an
    39        unreasonably high threshold for statements to get into that
    40        category.
    41
    42        So, for example, if a parent said:  "I am concerned because
    43        Emily will not eat her greens", that was classified as a
    44        statement about eating up and being concerned that children
    45        were eating.  But what you have to ask, what underlies
    46        concern about eating greens?  One would not express it in
    47        the same way about : "Oh, I am concerned because she is not
    48        eating up her biscuits".  What underlies that statement is
    49        an awareness and acknowledgment that greens are, therefore,
    50        good for you.  So, the concern that Emily did not eat her 
    51        greens does express a concern about health and nutrition, 
    52        an underlying concern about health and nutrition; yet the 
    53        way that the statements were classified did not appear in
    54        that category.
    55
    56        So the net effect of this classification and coding process
    57        was to reduce the apparent concern about health and
    58        nutrition.
    59
    60        Thirdly, the research only tried to measure the direct

Prev Next Index