Day 065 - 09 Dec 94 - Page 48


     
     1        word -- "to differentiate between programmes and adverts,
     2        but their ability to distinguish them by non-verbal
     3        response was extremely good".
     4        A.  I would agree with the first part there.  As I have
     5        confirmed, that does refer to their ability to verbally
     6        differentiate.  I come back to the point as what they were
     7        able to distinguish non-verbally is less clear.
     8
     9   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  What you say the important thing is, whether
    10        they can tell that someone is trying to sell them
    11        something?
    12        A.  But that is different.  The ability to distinguish is
    13        not the same as an ability to know that something is being
    14        sold to you.
    15
    16   Q.   I am only too well aware of that.  That is why I put the
    17        suggestion to you.
    18        A.  Sorry.  I apologise.  Do you want to ask me again?
    19
    20   Q.   You need not apologise at all.  I was suggesting -- you
    21        tell me if I am wrong -- that you say the important thing
    22        is whether the child may be able to differentiate between
    23        the commercial and a programme.  But is what you are saying
    24        the important thing is whether, having made a distinction,
    25        the child can perceive that the commercial is trying to
    26        sell him or her something?
    27        A.  Yes, that is also very, very important in children
    28        developing understanding.  Perhaps one of the early stages
    29        is an ability in some way to differentiate, but, as Young
    30        quite clearly points out, that is not something that
    31        automatically happens by a certain age when a child reaches
    32        a certain birthday.  It is an on-going process which has
    33        many parts to it.
    34
    35   MR. RAMPTON:  I understand the proposition, Ms. Dibb.  My
    36        question was directed at another aspect, which is why you
    37        misdescribed the effect of that study in your paper.
    38        I would like an answer, please.
    39        A.  Yes, and I am happy to give you an answer.  The word
    40        that would have helped clarify this point, though it is
    41        clear in the paper and I have not sought, I feel, to
    42        purposely misrepresent it, is that it was referring to the
    43        ability to verbally differentiate.  This is one study.  It
    44        must be seen, I think, in the broader context of other
    45        studies as well.  The purpose of this section was to point
    46        out by using reference to some studies, the process through
    47        which children go through in learning to understand about
    48        advertising.
    49
    50   Q.   I will move from that, if I may, to another study on 
    51        precisely the same topic which was included as a chapter in 
    52        June Esserman's book which, apparently, you had at or 
    53        before the time when you wrote your paper.  You will find
    54        it, if you would be so good, in the second green file at
    55        tab 5.  Have you got it?
    56        A.  I have, yes.
    57
    58   Q.   I think I am right that you agreed with me last time you
    59        were here that June Esserman is something of an authority
    60        in this field; is that right?

Prev Next Index