Day 065 - 09 Dec 94 - Page 06
1 document from the cover, one sees this: "Summaries and
2 conclusions, children's food consumption. Children do to
3 some extent influence and drive food consumption in the
4 household. 19 per cent of all food servings in the home
5 are accounted for by children, hence they are an important
6 consumer group for manufacturers to consider".
7
8 Ms. Dibb, do you see any inconsistency between the passages
9 which I have just read and the first part of that sentence
10 in your discussion paper I read earlier?
11 A. I think on page 6, as you just pointed me to, the
12 report does acknowledge by using the words "undoubtedly,
13 impact food consumed" -- this report looked exclusively at
14 food in the home; it did not look at food outside the home
15 -- as a result of pester power, or by mother's exclusively
16 determining what their children will consume. Also,
17 I think, one has to take into account in the second part of
18 that sentence, what are the influences that may determine
19 what children will consume? So, in addition to the direct
20 influence of pester power, we have to add into that factors
21 that may determine what their children will consume.
22 I believe that advertising also plays a role in that. So,
23 to that extent, we are seeing one influence added on to
24 another.
25
26 Q. You do not see then any contradiction or, what one might
27 say, uneasy marriage between the words on page (i)
28 "children do to some extent influence and drive food
29 consumption in the household", and the words you have used
30 to represent the findings of this report, "market research
31 companies recognise that children are a major influence on
32 household food purchases"?
33 A. This is one reference that was quoted here.
34
35 Q. It is the reference you have given?
36 A. Yes.
37
38 Q. You come here as an expert on the effects of advertising on
39 children?
40 A. To be "a major influence" -- there are many major
41 influences. To say that an influence is "to some extent"
42 does not necessarily mean that that is not a major
43 influence, in my opinion.
44
45 Q. It is not what the report says, is it? Those are your
46 words, are they not?
47 A. It is an interpretation.
48
49 Q. Very well. Then, as I promised, we will have a look, if we
50 may, at the Leatherhead report, which is in the same first
51 bundle of references, section 8 tab 4. I remind you what
52 you wrote: "Market research companies recognise that
53 their" -- that is children's -- "influence is increasing
54 from being a major influence, presumably". The Leatherhead
55 you find at section 4, July 1991. This is your reference
56 at 122.
57
58 MR. JUSTICE BELL: What was the Taylor Nelson date?
59
60 MR. RAMPTON: May 1991, my Lord. Its overall heading is