Day 054 - 24 Nov 94 - Page 51
1 this basis, we would expect advertising literacy to be
2 developing during this period as the child tries to
3 understand the metaphors, hyperboles and various puns and
4 conundrums offered in contemporary British advertising.
5
6 "It is dangerous to assume that the older child and
7 adolescent has a fully fledged adult understanding of
8 advertising just because he or she can demonstrate an
9 awareness of the commercial and persuasive intent of this
10 form of communication."
11
12 I think that is fairly self-explanatory as to the
13 development of an advertising literacy in childhood. But
14 the point I wanted to go on to make is that understanding
15 the intent, the details, the purpose of an advertisement is
16 no real defence against its persuasiveness, otherwise it
17 could be argued: Why does anybody advertise to adults?
18 Adults have reached the level at which they are capable of
19 understanding the things that are talked about through this
20 development stage. I think this is quite a key point, is
21 that just by understanding the purpose of advertising that
22 does not mitigate this influential effect. The two I think
23 are quite different.
24
25 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I was going to ask whether it matters whether
26 the child understands or not, because a young child might
27 understand perfectly well that it is an advertisement, let
28 us suppose in any particular case, but it does not follow
29 from that that it will have any less impact?
30 A. Yes. I think there are two points here. The first
31 does raise the question which has been raised going back to
32 the 1970s, particularly in the United States, whether it is
33 right to advertise to a child who does not understand the
34 purpose of advertising. That was the basis on which the
35 Federal Trade Commission made proposals in the 1970s for
36 restricting advertising to children. It was also ----
37
38 MR. MORRIS: Do you know the restrictions that were suggested?
39 A. Yes, if I can refer you to "Advertiser's Dream".
40
41 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Which page?
42 A. On page 29. "In 1979 the Federal Trade Commission"
43 (this is in the United States) introduced proposals to ban
44 television advertisement directed at children under 8 in
45 the sugared food products to those under 12, together with
46 the requirement that advertisers devote to money to public
47 service messages promoting good dental and nutritional
48 habits." Now those proposals never came to fruition.
49
50 MS. STEEL: Do you want to say why that was?
51
52 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Well, I can see.
53 A. The reason the Federal, part of the reason the Federal
54 Trade Commission sought to introduce -----
55
56 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I see, why they sought to introduce the ban,
57 rather than why it failed?
58 A. I am not sure, have I misunderstood the question?
59
60 Q. I think Ms. Steel and I were at cross purposes. I thought