Day 054 - 24 Nov 94 - Page 44
1 as within that limited range that is being projected to
2 them? So, when they think of a snack or a meal, they do
3 not think: "Oh, I will go to a cafe or I will have this
4 kind of meal", they see the false choice range?
5 A. Yes, I think as I referred to the conclusion that is
6 drawn here, is that often minimal differences, particularly
7 from a nutritional point of view, between foods is
8 highlighted and given a degree of salience.
9
10 Q. So, people feel they are making a choice but they are not
11 actually making a real choice?
12 A. Yes, their choice from a nutritional point of view is
13 much more restricted.
14
15 Q. Prawn flavoured crisps rather than sweet and sour?
16 A. Yes.
17
18 MS. STEEL: I am not quite sure where you were up to. Was there
19 anything else you wanted to refer to from that paper at all
20 or not?
21 A. I think I felt I made the connection between
22 advertising and its effects on food choices.
23
24 Q. Right. OK. Were there other papers that you were wanting
25 to refer to at this point?
26 A. I think I have referred to the ones that are most
27 relevant for the time being. Obviously, these are just
28 some examples of research in this area.
29
30 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Very well.
31
32 MS. STEEL: The response to advertisements, is that the same for
33 adults and children or is there a difference in
34 responsiveness?
35 A. Children have been shown to be more responsive to
36 advertising than adults. One research, piece of research,
37 which has looked at this was conducted by a research
38 company called Milward Brown. This is referred to in
39 section A No. 3, a paper entitled How Children Use the
40 Media by Phil Gullen of J. Walter Thompson. He refers to
41 the Millward Brown research on page 8. Millward Brown are
42 probably one the UK's leading research companies
43 specialising in children advertising and children. What
44 they found was that children were three times as likely as
45 adults to recall advertisements, and in the longer term
46 their residual recall level was also over twice as high
47 than adults. Children also remember more detail about
48 adverts than adults. I think I mentioned earlier on that
49 children do view advertisements quite differently to
50 adults.
51
52 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Is that what you mean then when you say in
53 your statement "Children being shown to be three times more
54 responsive to advertising than adults"?
55 A. Yes.
56
57 Q. That the memorability generated was three times higher?
58 A. Yes. The implication of that is to have the same level
59 of recall about an advertisement a child would only have to
60 view, for example, one commercial for the product compared