Day 050 - 10 Nov 94 - Page 23


     
     1        some influence over dietary habits, would you say that that
     2        is true?
     3        A.  No, that is not true.  The Health of the Nation has not
     4        identified advertising in the way that you describe it.  It
     5        has reported that there are different views on the
     6        subject.  A group of people, no doubt including you and
     7        friends of yours, have expressed the view that that may be
     8        so, but the Health of the Nation does not take a position
     9        that says advertising does have that effect.
    10
    11   MR. RAMPTON:  My Lord, if Mr. Morris is going to contradict the
    12        witness on this section, he must show him the passage,
    13        I would submit, in the Health of the Nation which supports
    14        what he (Mr Morris) is putting.
    15
    16   MR. MORRIS:  I will not go deep into that subject, because
    17        I think this is a nutritional -----
    18
    19   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I think it is.  I think you have really moved
    20        off Mr. Miles's area.  It is so easy in this case, where
    21        there is an element of cross-over, to find that one is just
    22        going back to matters which have either
    23        already -- Mr. Morris, if I am actually talking to you, it
    24        is just as well to listen, and then I will give you time to
    25        talk to Ms. Steel afterwards.  All I am saying is that
    26        everyone has to be wary in this case of straying off the
    27        subject with which the particular witness is dealing.
    28
    29   MR. MORRIS:  I did give the witness an opportunity to withdraw
    30        the comment about difficult feeders.
    31
    32   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  There we are.  I think we have gone back into
    33        nutrition.
    34
    35   MS. STEEL:  Can I just ask:  you said something along the lines
    36        of -- we were on that area just now, but, also, in your
    37        examination in-chief -- that you did not see a problem with
    38        ads being lively, entertaining, amusing and warm, that were
    39        directed at children?
    40        A.  Yes.
    41
    42   Q.   If those advertisements were showing cigarettes or alcohol,
    43        would you think that it was a problem for the ads to be
    44        associating those kinds of products with those kinds of
    45        emotions?
    46        A.  The Code specifically prohibits those products being
    47        advertised to children.
    48
    49   Q.   Yes, I realise that.  But if the advertisements were not
    50        prohibited, would you see a problem with cigarettes and 
    51        alcohol being associated with liveliness, fun, warmth, and 
    52        that kind of thing? 
    53        A.  I have to say, that is such a hypothetical question
    54        that I cannot answer it.
    55
    56        The reason why it is prohibited is because there is general
    57        agreement in society that alcoholic drinks, for example,
    58        should not be thrust at children.  That is a subject on
    59        which there is a large consensus in society; and,
    60        certainly, I agree with that view.  So I think your

Prev Next Index