Day 048 - 08 Nov 94 - Page 45
1 type themes, are there not?
2 A. None of these are mutually exclusive.
3
4 Q. So, in fact, you do not abandon the tweens in terms of your
5 advertising, but they are included in the adult
6 advertising?
7 A. We do not -- I mean, we do not abandon, certainly not.
8 We have been -- and I think I said this earlier -- we have
9 been actually fairly poor at specifically targeting that
10 market. They will see our family and our adult
11 advertising.
12
13 Q. They do not need to be specifically targeted as much, do
14 they, because they are watching adult programmes, are they
15 not?
16 A. It depends. If the appropriateness of McDonald's as a
17 product is not right for that particular age group, for
18 whatever reason, then we will not be relevant to them. So
19 then they can see the adult advertising, but they still
20 will not want to come to McDonald's, because it is not
21 relevant to them. I believe it is relevant, which is why
22 tweens do come to our restaurants, but we do not write
23 advertising, generally, with these tweens in mind.
24
25 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Can I just stop a moment? Is your point
26 this, that the figure for 1992 is 14.66 percent of
27 television advertising spend on children. Some of the
28 balance of 85.3 percent is biting on tweens who are, in
29 fact, children, i.e., up to 15?
30 A. In the context of family advertising, yes, it would.
31
32 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Is that your point?
33
34 MR. MORRIS: I think so, yes.
35
36 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Why did you not just put that right at the
37 beginning?
38
39 MR. MORRIS: Maybe we will move on.
40
41 MS. STEEL: Would an example of that be that World Cup advert
42 that you were relating the other day, that could well
43 appeal to tweens?
44 A. Yes. I think that would appeal to virtually all
45 segments of the population.
46
47 Q. Is it right that you are also currently sponsoring a
48 programme, I think on Channel 4, called Gamesmaster?
49 A. That is correct.
50
51 Q. And that is a programme aimed at teenagers?
52 A. Yes.
53
54 MR. MORRIS: That does not come under children's advertising
55 expenditure?
56 A. It is only two years ago that we did it. It would not
57 come under advertising, because it is not advertising, but
58 it would come under a sponsorship line.
59
60 MS. STEEL: So it would come under sponsorship, but your logo is