Day 048 - 08 Nov 94 - Page 40
1 continue going down?
2 A. There is a few things in there. I cannot give a
3 projection for the future. We do not make our marketing
4 decisions based simply on levels of expenditure rising or
5 falling in different areas. It is very much a question of
6 the job to be done and the needs of the company. So it
7 would be very difficult for me to predict the future in
8 that way.
9
10 The previous point about, does it start at a certain level
11 and continue to go down, the same thing really applies.
12 Different regions may take off differently at different
13 timescales, and it would, certainly in different regions,
14 show different patterns. Those figures are based on a sort
15 of national show, right across the country. It would vary
16 by region.
17
18 MR. MORRIS: But the overall trend, is it projected back from
19 1992 to when it started in 1974, going downwards? That
20 would be the general pattern, in terms of the proportion of
21 children's advertising----
22
23 MR. JUSTICE BELL: If you actually look at the figures, it has
24 been virtually the same over 1990, 1991 and 1992, to within
25 less than five percentage points; and the witness has said
26 he cannot give a projection on children's advertising for
27 the future. It obviously depends on current factors. So
28 there is not a downward trend over the last three years.
29
30 MR. MORRIS: But going back to the '70s and the early '80s, has
31 that trend down to 14 percent, would that be reflected
32 going back to -- would that be the general pattern?
33 A. I would have to look back at the numbers. It could be
34 that one region affects the national average. London is a
35 more expensive medium than Scotland, so that would change
36 the percentages, again. There are so many other factors in
37 there that it is really difficult to give you a general
38 answer without going back and trying to look at all the
39 numbers.
40
41 Q. You do not know the figures before 1986, then, which was
42 31 percent -- or do you know the figures for the early
43 '80s?
44 A. I personally do not know, no.
45
46 Q. If we can clarify, these are figures that you have given,
47 and what we have looked at is for under eight or
48 nine year-olds who specifically watch children's
49 programmes; yes?
50 A. Over what time period?
51
52 Q. In general, what we have been looking at in the documents
53 early on and the figures you have given in your statement;
54 we are talking about, I think you said, something like
55 between under, around about eight or nine year-olds, under
56 that, in general?
57 A. The problem I have with that is, as I stated this
58 morning, our buying strategy changed many times across the
59 course of those years.
60