Day 041 - 28 Oct 94 - Page 14
1 McDonald's has considered, then please answer my question:
2 Is there a difference in the kind of usage perceived as
3 between the 25 to 34 year-olds with children and the 16 to
4 24 year-old categories, the kind of usage they make of
5 McDonald's?
6 A. There is a difference, but it applies to -- it is quite
7 a complex area, but in terms of the average single 16 to 24
8 year-old -----
9
10 Q. Yes.
11 A. -- they tend to be more promiscuous, if you like, in
12 terms of their use of different QSR restaurants.
13
14 Q. "Promiscuous" is obviously in those terms a term of art.
15 Can you explain what you mean by that so we are sure?
16
17 MR. JUSTICE BELL: If it had not got connotations within the
18 balance of this century, it would be a perfectly ordinary
19 word in every day use.
20
21 MR. RAMPTON: I was not actually thinking that; I just wondered
22 whether it had a special meaning.
23
24 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Does it just mean they go where it pleases
25 them next?
26 A. Correct, so they will use a wide repertoire of
27 restaurants.
28
29 MR. RAMPTON: Whereas you rely heavily on them to eat your food,
30 it is quite likely they are also eating at Burger King and
31 Pizza Huts and at everything else besides McDonald's?
32 A. That is correct. You can argue they are less brand
33 loyal. The older age category with children see McDonald's
34 as particularly appropriate to them because of what we
35 offer in the restaurant. So, they tend to be more brand
36 loyal to McDonald's.
37
38 Q. How, in your perception, as one of the people responsible
39 for spending McDonald's money on advertising, is that brand
40 loyalty amongst people with children generated?
41 A. It starts actually through the experience in the
42 restaurant, but in terms of how we develop that and grow
43 that it is based on advertising both to adults and to
44 children. So both parties are aware of what McDonald's is
45 offering and, therefore, as a joint decision can visit
46 McDonald's.
47
48 MR. JUSTICE BELL: This chart, Mr. Rampton, obviously does not
49 include children up to and including the age of 15.
50
51 MR. RAMPTON: No.
52
53 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I can see that children up to the age of,
54 say, nine or ten might be expected to be escorted by an
55 adult, but I would not have thought that followed for
56 children, for instance, in the last year of primary school,
57 first year in secondary school, up to the age of 15;
58 I would have thought quite often they go on their own with
59 friends of the same age.
60 A. You are talking of sort of 12?