- McLibel -

Re: Why attack McDonalds

Posted by: Fergus Murray ( UK ) on December 11, 1996 at 23:17:32:

In Reply to: Why attack McDonalds posted by Elizabeth Chamberlain on November 29, 1996 at 18:43:05:

> The question is not Why, but WHY NOT?
> Freedom of speach. That's why not.
What the hell are you talking about?
We shouldn't attack McDonalds' abuses of their workers,
the environment and the animals they kill, because of freedom
of speach (speech)? Is that what you're saying?

Follow Ups:

Freedom of speech is not absolute. george none USA July 21 1998 (4)
- prove it, boycot it and inform others Adria L. Chappell September 04 1998 (0)
- Re: Freedom of speech is not absolute. Angel Vae August 02 1998 (2)
  - What is ethnicide? Wayne Parry Melbourne, Australia August 11 1998 (1)
    - Djihad vs. MacWorld ronald mc ass October 27 1998 (0)