You like to twist words, do you?The reason for me to show that I belonged to the majority was not that it make my views right (even if I think they are), the reason was because you seemed surpriced about my views, which I think is strange just because the most people have them (my views about eating meat).
That you are genteticly coded to partly eat meat make my views (at least biologicly) right. The scientists and your own body all agrees about the fact that you are coded to eat a "fare" consisting partly of meat. Their is some essential amino acids and some essential fatty acids that only (natural) can be found in meat.
How come I am one of the worst meateater you have met? Are you not used to that "our kind" fight back. The most people have exactly my views then it comes to slaughter and eat meat, why am I the worst?
By the way:
You didn't answer the question what we shall do with old and sick animals? Retirement homes or what? Are you paying?
The only thing you've said is that we have the responsibility to care for them. What do you mean by responsibility? How should we care? Should we feed them to other animals? That's one of the natures own way to take care of old and sick animals. Another one is just leave them to die.
Mankind has bean an all eater from the day that we put a foot on the earth. The most archgeologists agrees about that, even though I believe you have your own truth about that too.
When it comes to meat eaters, vegeterians, and health, I think that I have shown elsewhere (on this site) that there is NO evidence about that meat is unhealthy. There is a clear correspondence between weight and health, I can agree with you about that. But if you take two humans with the only difference in eating meat or not, there is NO evidence. This doesn't, however, change the fact that vegetables are good for you.
Best regards, // Lars
