: No, we are not putting you in a box, rather lookuing towards teh ramifications/import/direction of your ideas in relation to otehr ideas and to society.saying "he is a...." sounds rather boxy to me. When we discuss I can see the above point, when referred to in third person it doesnt come accross well.
: No, because I said that you're ideology is of a petit bourgeois type, I'm fairly convinced you are working class.
I recall your earlier definition of working class as being very broad indeed. I'm not a 'dont take my Merc' rich kid that SDF understandibly dislikes.
: I didn't write it off, I defined it so as to analyse it, a different approach to that of Marcos.
He's a bit of a card!
: You do espouse a mish-mash of opposing and different ideas, but your inherent ideology is that of an Adma Smith style small hodler capitalism- deny it if you please, I'm sure we can debate it.
There are very few contradictions, and I will correct when I see them, (ie im not an idealist) - contradictions do not exist. I do espouse many ideas, but If I understand 'mish-mash' correctly then I dont considering them mishing at all, and mashing only a little!
We will probably come back to debating whether I hold small things or not at some point, kinda post-fatigued at present though.
None.
