: DADDIO: What’s subjective about the observational fact that a penis is designed for peeing and procreation and an anus is designed for expelling fecal matter? If these are subjective judgements then there’s so such thing as objectivism. Designed by whom? frankly I use my penis for mixing cocktails, and engaging in Modern Art techiniques. The objective way of putting it is to say that the penis is the outlet for both water and sperm, and the anus teh outlet for feacal matter- there implying design is subjkective. Thus saying 'the Penis is the place where I keep my "Prince Albert" ring' is also equally objective.
: Stuart, not being a homosexual himself (or being a damn good actor) and probably having read Leviticus 20:13 (I believe this is the hot-button verse on homosexuality) has every BIBLICAL right to judge the living crap out of anything that’s gay and breaths air.
Actually, see my post, the points are disputed, the only categorical text is Paul, where he says gay men are dirty, lascivious, liars and ought to be killed...arsehole.
: What it can deliver beyond that should not be a substitute for a persons own innate ability to discern from right and wrong or to measure the normalcy of homosexual acts. Anatomy 101 can handle the latter.
How, unless its an appeal to design, which implies a subjective comnsciousness determining the intended use value- egg whisks are for whisking eggs, don't use them to whisk batter- thats teh end tendancy of your argument.
