Day 273 - 03 Jul 96 - Page 32
1 A. The same format, and other than the two change the
2 rest of the leaflet would have been the same.
3
4 MR. MORRIS: And this fold, this particular format of being two
5 sheets slotted in together folder over, that continued
6 until when?
7 A. It would have only been within the last few years that
8 we had access to an A3 printer. Until that time it has
9 always been done as two separate sheets inserted together.
10
11 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Can you remember when you got the A3 printer?
12 A. We do not have it ourselves. It is somebody else that
13 has the printer.
14
15 MR. JUSTICE BELL: That you have the use of?
16 A. Have the use of, it is possibly '83, '84.
17
18 MS. STEEL: Do you mean--
19 A. Sorry '93 '94.
20
21 MR. MORRIS: So in terms of the relevance to this case any
22 available Veggies version of the London Greenpeace fact
23 sheet would have been in this format?
24 A. As far as I can recall, yes.
25
26 Q. And while it was in that format I notice that the Veggies
27 fact sheet, that we now have a copy of, that we have used
28 up to now in this courtroom, has got the words 'December
29 91' on it?
30 A. Yes.
31
32 Q. And it includes a box about CFC's and ozone-friendly
33 packages?
34 A. That is right. I think in about 1990 or 1991,
35 thereabouts, the issue of global warming and CFC's was
36 obviously very much--
37
38 Q. Yes. I do not want to know about the issue. When did it,
39 was it December '91 when the ozone friendly box started to
40 appear?
41 A. I cannot recall the exact date that that box was first
42 put in, I am afraid.
43
44 Q. But if we are talking about the period of distribution
45 around '89 and '90. Yes?
46 A. Yes.
47
48 Q. Of the Veggies fact sheet that it would, or would it not
49 have included that ozone friendly box? It may not be?
50 A. I cannot be 100 per cent sure but I would suspect at
51 that stage it would not have that box.
52
53 Q. So it would have been very likely exactly the same with the
54 amendments you had made following the solicitors
55 correspondence?
56 A. That is right.
57
58 Q. Thank you. Okay. That is fine. In that case, I will move
59 on to the supplementary statement dated March 3rd 1994.
60 A. I do not have a copy of it but if you are going to be