Day 273 - 03 Jul 96 - Page 16
1 priority of the anti-McDonald's campaign in '89/'90.
2
3 Q. The idea of rewriting the fact sheet or producing a new
4 pamphlet under the London Greenpeace -- about McDonald's or
5 against McDonald's with the London Greenpeace imprint had
6 nothing whatever to do with any of the inquiry agents, did
7 it? It was not their idea?
8 A. No, no, it was not their idea. It was my idea.
9
10 Q. And they did not have anything to do with the writing or
11 the distribution or the views expressed in your
12 anti-McDonald's campaign document for 1990 either, did
13 they?
14 A. Which document?
15
16 Q. The one we were looking at earlier.
17 A. Anti-McDonald's campaign 1990?
18
19 Q. Anti-McDonald's campaign 1990.
20 A. Yes, they did. They were responsible for
21 distribution.
22
23 Q. They what?
24 A. They were -- well, one of them was responsible for the
25 distribution, Michelle Hooker.
26
27 Q. Distribution, yes, but they did not write it?
28 A. No, I wrote it.
29
30 Q. They did not contribute to it?
31 A. I wrote it. It was entirely my words. No one else's.
32
33 Q. Finally then, on Michelle Hooker, you say she handed out
34 anti-McDonald's leaflets now, apparently including this
35 one. It did not include the fact sheet, did it?
36 A. No, I never saw her handing out the fact sheet, no,
37 no.
38
39 MR. RAMPTON: Yes, Mr. Gravett, thank you.
40
41 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Thank you.
42
43 MR. MORRIS: Can we just have five minutes? We are bit
44 surprised at how quickly --
45
46 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Yes. Is Mr. Smith here?
47
48 MR. MORRIS: Yes.
49
50 MR. JUSTICE BELL: And you are ready to go straight on with him
51 after Mr. Gravett?
52
53 MR. MORRIS: Yes.
54
55 MR. JUSTICE BELL: We will have the five minutes and follow on.
56
57 (Short Adjournment)
58
59
60 Re-examined by the Defendants