Day 259 - 10 Jun 96 - Page 06
1 this is a meeting on 26th April -- "the subject matter
2 turned to the international mail out. Dave Morris, who had
3 previously been described to me and identified by
4 photographs", and so on. Where were these photographs of
5 Mr. Morris from?
6 A. I have no idea.
7
8 Q. You have no idea?
9 A. No, none at all. I did not know Mr. Morris.
10
11 Q. He was not on the 1989 pickets, so it could not have been
12 from there?
13 A. No, not that I know of. I certainly have not seen any
14 photographs of him being there.
15
16 Q. So your company must have had photographs of Mr. Morris
17 from some other source?
18 A. No. They did not come from me, no.
19
20 Q. You were in charge of the litigation?
21 A. Yes.
22
23 Q. You must have been kept aware of what was going on and
24 where photographs had been taken?
25 A. Yes. I would just point out that this is referring to
26 an incident on Thursday, 26th April 1990 ---
27
28 Q. Yes?
29 A. -- which is six months after the inquiry began. The
30 photographs could have come from anywhere.
31
32 Q. So, during the course of the investigations, some of the
33 investigators were taking photographs of people as part of
34 the group?
35 A. I do not know. That is something to ask the
36 investigators.
37
38 Q. Are you seriously saying that you do not know anything
39 about any other photographs than the 1989 picket ones?
40 A. That there were some photographs taken of the offices.
41 They are the only other photographs I can, at this moment
42 in time, remember.
43
44 MR. JUSTICE BELL: What do you mean, the officers?
45 A. The offices of London Greenpeace.
46
47 Q. Offices ---
48 A. Well, there are -----
49
50 Q. -- or officers?
51 A. No. Sorry -- offices.
52
53 MS. STEEL: Were those photographs taken on your instructions?
54 A. No.
55
56 Q. You had not made any request to do that, then?
57 A. No.
58
59 Q. Were you surprised to get them, then?
60 A. No. It is the kind of thing you would expect agents to