Day 250 - 15 May 96 - Page 27
1 Q. Did you see 3 or 4 different names?
2 A. I cannot remember, I really cannot remember, this is
3 years ago now.
4
5 MR. JUSTICE BELL: What percentage of your time was the
6 London Greenpeace investigation taking in late '89 and
7 through 1990?
8 A. Five per cent.
9
10 Q. Yes. The trouble is, in litigation everyone in court seems
11 to think that is the only thing that is going on in the
12 world?
13 A. I concentrated on that completely, I would say.
14
15 Q. About one 20th of your time?
16 A. I would say, my Lord, I had 3 departments I was
17 running, no more than ten per cent would be security, and
18 of that that includes London Greenpeace, 35 per cent
19 perhaps was personnel and the rest was franchising.
20
21 MS. STEEL: So London Greenpeace you just thought was a very
22 minor problem in your security?
23
24 MR. JUSTICE BELL: No, that is a complete non-sequitur, you can
25 spend one per cent of your time saving your own life. It
26 does not mean it is unimportant?
27 A. No.
28
29 MS. STEEL: It is?
30 A. It was very important, but from the point of view that
31 I was running an observation on the organisation, but
32 equally important was getting franchisees into the
33 programme. That is what McDonald's thought, what I spent
34 most of my time on, expanding the business.
35
36 Q. All these private investigators that you were aware of, and
37 I think we have got to at least 6, very probably more -- it
38 must be more than that because we were aware of five from
39 Kings alone -- they were all, to your knowledge, employed
40 between October 1989 and January 1991?
41 A. Yes.
42
43 Q. Did it not actually concern you that you might be dwarfing
44 the numbers of people that were involved in
45 London Greenpeace and influencing the activities of the
46 group?
47 A. No.
48
49 MR. JUSTICE BELL: What was the maximum it occurred to you that
50 you knew of, altogether, from both sources? In the light
51 of that last question I would like you to give me your
52 evidence, and Ms. Steel can challenge it further, but what
53 picture did you have of how many people were on the ground
54 involved in the inquiry altogether?
55 A. Four from Kings, and two, perhaps 3.
56
57 Q. I have not got a clear picture of it -- and how many from?
58 A. Two, perhaps three, from Bishops, but I realised that
59 may not have been all they used, there may have been
60 agencies they used just as corroboration just for their