Day 250 - 15 May 96 - Page 22
1 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Is there a date on that letter?
2
3 MS. STEEL: There is not a date on it, although the page behind
4 it there is a typed letter from the Philadelphia
5 Unemployment Project dated May 15th, 1990, addressed to
6 Greenpeace London.
7
8 MR. MORRIS: That is from Bill Davidson who, you may recall,
9 became a witness in the case under a Civil Evidence Act
10 notice.
11
12 MR. JUSTICE BELL: If there was a date on it, I wanted to know
13 for my note. That is all.
14
15 MS. STEEL: Right. I cannot see a date on the one before.
16 Behind that letter from the Philadelphia Unemployment
17 Project is the Wage Abuse in the Fast-food Industry Study
18 and all the press cuttings related to that. If I just hand
19 that up to the witness.
20
21 MR. RAMPTON: I think I would like to see it first, if I may, my
22 Lord.
23
24 MS. STEEL: It was all disclosed by the Plaintiffs, so they
25 have seen it.
26
27 MR. RAMPTON: Perhaps I have seen it, but that was a long time
28 ago. (Handed). Thank you.
29
30 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Let Mr. Nicholson see it. (Handed to the
31 witness).
32
33 MS. STEEL: If you just have a look through all the letters
34 that are there. I do not mean read them all, but if you
35 have a flick through.
36 A. Yes.
37
38 Q. Are you familiar with those documents or do you not
39 remember?
40 A. No, I do not remember. I can only remember one
41 occasion when I was advised -- I mean, Mrs. Brinley-Codd
42 and I discussed the fact that one of the agents sent
43 through some letters and I said that is not to be done.
44 And, to my knowledge, Mrs. Brinley-Codd phoned the agency
45 up and told them that, but whether these are those letters
46 or not I cannot say, it is years ago.
47
48 Q. You said that was Kings Investigation Bureau?
49 A. I thought it was.
50
51 Q. I mean, we have letters which were taken by Mr. Bishop
52 which are attached behind his statement as well?
53 A. You will have to remind me. I do not know these
54 people, you see. Who is Bishop?
55
56 Q. Brian Bishop. The thing is, we do not know which company
57 they are from. I do not know whether the Plaintiffs can
58 tell us which company each of them were from. We know for
59 some of them, but -----
60