Day 242 - 29 Apr 96 - Page 23


     
     1
     2   MR. MORRIS:  And that Co-Ope Montecillos, their supplier, has
     3        said that the three regions that supply McDonald's were
     4        deforested in the 50s and 60s -- they said that on January
     5        30th 1992, Juan Sequeira -- in your opinion, bearing in
     6        mind also what David Rose has said ------
     7
     8   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  No, just put it in that form.  You have to
     9        put your premise because if you say "bearing in mind what
    10        someone has said", I do not know what the premise is
    11        because I do not know whether it is acceptable or not until
    12        I decide it.  It is much easier if you say "supposing", as
    13        in fact you started to do, "most of McDonald's farms", for
    14        want of a better term, "were deforested in the 1950s and
    15        1960s", then you ask your question.
    16
    17   MR. MORRIS:  Yes.  (To the witness):  Because of what you
    18        called, I think, the deforestation frenzy in the 70s, do
    19        you think that would have applied, from all the information
    20        that you have heard, to farms supplying McDonald's?
    21        A.  There is no reason to suppose that it would not have
    22        applied -- forgive the tortured phrasing, but .....
    23
    24   Q.   I think you have lost your thread a bit; you have certainly
    25        lost me.
    26        A.  Well, let me rephrase it.  There is no evidence that
    27        would indicate that it would be impossible for it to have
    28        applied -- in the absence of direct evidence that it did
    29        apply and neither is there evidence that it could not have
    30        applied.
    31
    32   Q.   What applied?
    33
    34   MR. MORRIS:  The deforestation on those farms that were
    35        established in the 50s and that were supplying McDonald's
    36        would have continued into the 1970s, as indeed David Rose
    37        had indicated?
    38        A.  The deforestation continued, clearly.
    39
    40   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  No, you have lost me completely.
    41
    42   MR. MORRIS:  OK.
    43
    44   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  As I understand it, the premise is that they
    45        were deforested in the 1950s and 1960s.
    46
    47   MR. MORRIS:  That is admitted.
    48
    49   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Yes, but then what are you asking
    50        Dr. Carriere from that platform? 
    51 
    52   MR. MORRIS:  Bearing in mind that he said that the established 
    53        ranches would have continued deforesting for a period after
    54        they were established, so they contain forests, and that
    55        the extent of the deforestation that occurred in the 1970s
    56         -- I mean, we can just leave it as a matter of argument at
    57        the end of the case, if you like.  I think we have all the
    58        information in front of us.
    59
    60   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Yes.  Is there anything else?

Prev Next Index