Day 239 - 23 Apr 96 - Page 15
1 cities or to move to the rainforests. The western
2 Amazonian states of Rondonia and Acre are crowded with
3 peasants driven out of southern Brazil (over 1.5 million
4 arrived in the 1980s) by agroindustrialists. Many I
5 interviewed told me that their land had been taken for soya
6 production. Once in the Amazon they are constrained to try
7 to survive by clearing the forest and planting crops. This
8 has an enormous ecological impact: small farmers are the
9 most intractable of the causes of deforestation in
10 Amazonia."
11 A. Does that statement require any explanation? My point
12 here is that while small farmers account, at the last
13 count, for about 21 percent of deforestation, you cannot
14 exactly stop that at the click of your fingers because they
15 have to make their livelihood there once they are in the
16 forest. So you cannot just say: "We must stop having these
17 small farmers here" as you could say, for instance, "We
18 could stop this ranching", because it is not the case that
19 people tend to depend on them for their livelihood on the
20 ranching whereas the small farmers tend to depend on their
21 livelihood on their clearings in the forest. That is what
22 I mean by that.
23
24 Q. "All the significant soya production enterprise in Brazil
25 use land that was once either forested or in the hands of
26 peasant farmers: there is, therefore, not likely to be any
27 major soya farm in the country that has not had an
28 important ecological impact. Soya in Brazil is produced
29 principally for export, for cattle feed in Europe and the
30 United States. Brazilian soya is an important ingredient
31 in the diet of beef cattle throughout Britain and Europe:
32 Brazil provides approximately one third of Europe's soya
33 needs. The principal exporters of Brazilian soya include
34 Cargill USA, Continental Grain USA, Sunge USA, Dreyfuss
35 France and Toepfer.
36
37 If, as I have been informed, it is true that cattle
38 destined for McDonald's in Germany and elsewhere have been
39 fed on soya beans emanating at certain times of the year,
40 from Brazil, then McDonald's is an inextricable part of the
41 chain that leads to deforestation in Brazil. McDonald's
42 successful promotion of the hamburger as a desirable and
43 culturally significant food worldwide has lead to increased
44 demand for beef in many countries and, as a result, an
45 increased demand for Brazilian soya. This has helped soya
46 to become one of Brazil's most profitable growth industries
47 in the 1990s and, therefore, helped generate the intense
48 pressure for the expansion of soya fields. In these
49 different ways, therefore, it is my opinion that McDonald's
50 is partly responsible for forest clearance, displacement of
51 peasants and the continued cultivation of land which might
52 have reverted to rainforest.
53
54 1st November, 1993".
55
56 Do you stand by that statement?
57 A. Yes, I do.
58
59 MR. JUSTICE BELL: If you want to sit down at any stage, Mr.
60 Monbiot, just pull the chair forward so that you are still