Day 172 - 12 Oct 95 - Page 44


     
     1
     2   MR. MORRIS:  Right.
     3
     4   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  In some cases I would welcome positive help;
     5        for instance, surveys, which were mentioned in the past.
     6        But that is another topic.
     7
     8   MR. RAMPTON:  Can I say, it might help if I said a word about
     9        that.  We -- Mrs. Brinley-Codd and I -- have been working
    10        on that problem intermittently since about July, and it
    11        started off with a sort of a ramble through what we called
    12        computer documents.  The problem is they are a very great
    13        deal bigger than that on both sides.  The reason is that
    14        there is an awful lot of material of second or third
    15        generation before your Lordship.  Sometimes it has been
    16        made by the witness who has identified the sources, but
    17        even that does not really cure the problem.  But very often
    18        it has not.
    19
    20        All these documents, whether they are computer generated or
    21        generated by human beings directly, could be strictly
    22        proved as evidence of the truth of their contents by an
    23        enormously costly and laborious, though not in the least
    24        bit difficult intellectually, machinery under the Civil
    25        Evidence Act.  But it would take a very, very long time and
    26        an awful lot of effort to do it.
    27
    28        What we are proposing to do is to produce a list of all the
    29        documents on our side -- we are not doing to do the
    30        Defendants'; they must do those that they want to rely on;
    31        we are not going to undertake that -- produce a list of all
    32        the documents that are before your Lordship in one form or
    33        another, whether any appendices to the statements or in the
    34        trial bundles, that we think are of that character and will
    35        strictly need validating by a Civil Evidence Act notice but
    36        which we wish to rely on and would invite the Defendants
    37        not just to take a technical objection for the sake of
    38        making a nuisance, because if they do that there is a
    39        further stage; your Lordship always has a discretion under
    40        the rules to dispense with all the formalities of the Civil
    41        Evidence Act requirements under the rules and simply admit
    42        the evidence.  When we have finished the task we will
    43        present that list with references so that everybody knows
    44        what it is, what the document is that we would like your
    45        Lordship to take into account.
    46
    47   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Might I suggest that as soon as you have
    48        completed the list, or think you have completed the list,
    49        you raise it rather than waiting any longer.
    50 
    51   MR. RAMPTON:  Of course. 
    52 
    53   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  So that we can discuss the matter further
    54        with the actual list in mind.
    55
    56   MR. RAMPTON:  That is why it has taken us so long.  It is a
    57        devil of a job because there are so many of them, and it
    58        certainly needs completing before ever we get to closing
    59        speeches.
    60

Prev Next Index