Day 172 - 12 Oct 95 - Page 26


     
     1        credibility or weight -----
     2
     3   MR. JUSTICE BELL: Which are those?
     4
     5   MR. RAMPTON:  They are the end of the second sentence: "I was
     6        considered a bit of a phenomenon, so they let me get away
     7        with it."
     8
     9   MR. JUSTICE BELL: Which page?
    10
    11   MR. RAMPTON:  Page 4, paragraph 7.  Second sentence, he
    12        says: "I was considered a bit of a phenomenon" -- refusing
    13        to work extra hours, this is -- "so they let me get away
    14        it, although people were regularly dismissed for behaving
    15        like that without notice."  Again, one wonders -- at least
    16        I do -- what conceivable basis there could be for that
    17        except hearsay.  Unless he actually was present when such a
    18        person -- and he says "regularly" -- on every occasion when
    19        such a person was dismissed in those circumstances, it must
    20        necessarily be hearsay.
    21
    22        We come back to a similar thing at the bottom of the
    23        paragraph.  There is a whole sentence, a complete sentence,
    24        five lines up, which says: "It happened to a friend of
    25        mine."  Well, he says he remembers one occasion, and then
    26        he continues:  "It happened to a friend of mine."  Again,
    27        it could be something he witnessed, but it looks very much
    28        to us as though that is simply a report of what the friend
    29        told him.
    30
    31        Then I have the same problem, my Lord, with the last
    32        sentence of this paragraph as I had with the last part of
    33        the second sentence.  He writes: "However it was more
    34        common where management wanted to get rid of an employee
    35        for them to force the unwanted employee to leave by being
    36        particularly unpleasant to that employee."  Whereas he may
    37        be able to say that he remembers management being
    38        unpleasant to employees and that they then left, what he
    39        cannot possibly say is that that was done because the
    40        management wanted to get rid of them.  That is pure
    41        speculation.
    42
    43   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Yes.
    44
    45   MR. RAMPTON:  Next, in paragraph 8, the second sentence is quite
    46        obviously hearsay.  That speaks for itself: "A friend of my
    47        brother's worked at a McDonald's in Dublin and he was shown
    48        all sorts of training videos when he started work."  It
    49        sounds as though that is double hearsay; it sounds as
    50        though that is what the brother has told Magill. 
    51 
    52   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  If that came out, in fairness, I would have 
    53        to read into the next sentence "I was not shown any
    54        training videos", would I not?
    55
    56   MR. RAMPTON:  Yes, you would.
    57
    58   MR. JUSTICE BELL: Which is the only point which is being made
    59        there, in any event.
    60

Prev Next Index