Day 159 - 20 Jul 95 - Page 07


     
     1   MR. MORRIS:  Mr. Monbiot refers to the Brazilian Amazon
     2        throughout his statement and his concern is with the whole
     3        Amazon area in regard to both soya and to cattle ranching.
     4        We have already heard both that McDonald's have received
     5        supplies which have emanated from the Mato Grosso and that
     6        their northern-most, admitted most northern-most, supply
     7        plant is based in Goias which is adjacent to Mato Grosso.
     8
     9   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  All these are points which you made
    10        yesterday.  I have those points.  I am not harassing you.
    11        I have to just try and keep the theme of the argument in
    12        mind, and you referred me to one paragraph on page 2 which
    13        does not seem to be directed at your proposed amendment
    14        No. 1 at all.  It might have something to do with soya when
    15        we get to soya.  It might be all part of the knock-on
    16        effect, but you have addressed me on the knock-on effect.
    17
    18   MR. MORRIS:  Our understanding of the Mato Grosso area is that
    19        while it might be primarily cerrado, that includes areas of
    20        rain forest and that the distinction is largely -----
    21
    22   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Where is the evidence of that?
    23
    24   MR. MORRIS:  That is my belief based upon -----
    25
    26   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Yes, I know, but you know perfectly well what
    27        Neill LJ said and reasonable belief was one part of it.
    28        Reasonable belief may be relevant to your counterclaim,
    29        I accept that, or any belief, reasonable or unreasonable.
    30        What Neill LJ said is that you should believe the words
    31        complained of to be true.  That is the aspect you are on at
    32        the moment; that you should intend to support the defence
    33        of justification of the trial.  There we are.  But (c), The
    34        defendants should have reasonable evidence to support the
    35        plea, or reasonable grounds for supposing that sufficient
    36        evidence to prove the allegations will be available at
    37        trial.  He said that could include what you have reasonable
    38        grounds for supposing you could uncover by discovery or in
    39        cross-examination.  You cannot have reasonable grounds for
    40        supposing that there will be sufficient evidence from the
    41        gentleman you have spoken to from FOE because he is not, as
    42        far as I am aware, a potential witness in the case.
    43
    44   MR. MORRIS:  If it helps on that subject, if that is the
    45        sticking point, we certainly firmly believe what we have
    46        said, and that we could ask Charles Secret to make some
    47        kind of supplementary statement to that effect.
    48
    49   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I can only deal on the material I have.
    50 
    51   MR. RAMPTON:  So can I. 
    52 
    53   MS. STEEL:   To be honest, if we are supposed to have a
    54        reasonable expectation that there will be such evidence,
    55        I think it is quite unlikely, although I suppose by some
    56        stretch of the imagination it could be possible that the
    57        rain forests campaigner in Friends of the Earth is going to
    58        say one thing and Mr. Secret will say:  "No, that is a load
    59        of rubbish".
    60

Prev Next Index