Day 153 - 12 Jul 95 - Page 07
1
2 MR. RAMPTON: Are we talking about the basic starting rate or
3 not? Are we talking about the average rate, which is -----
4
5 MS. STEEL: We are talking about the basic starting rate, which
6 is relevant to this supposed compensation of removing paid
7 breaks.
8
9 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Argue the figures in due course. There is a
10 difference of recollection between Mr. Davis and what
11 appears in Mrs. Harrison's statement. We will hear her
12 evidence in due course, if she is called. If I think it is
13 important, I will have to decide which I prefer.
14
15 MS. STEEL: (To the witness) So are you saying that the Company
16 received written authorisation from all employees with this
17 change over?
18 A. No. I think it was the other way round: if they did
19 not want to take the pay rise, then they would inform HR or
20 the Manager who had organised it. I am sure there
21 was -----
22
23 Q. You mean if they did not want to change from paid breaks to
24 unpaid breaks?
25 A. That is right. I could not be certain, but there were
26 two or three people in the Colchester restaurant who did
27 not want to take paid breaks -- sorry, who wanted to remain
28 with paid breaks.
29
30 Q. They had to write a special letter to demand that they be
31 kept at the previous conditions?
32 A. Or inform the Manager, who would organise it.
33
34 MR. MORRIS: Even if was a 15 pence rise, which does not look
35 like it ---
36
37 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I can do the maths myself.
38
39 MR. MORRIS: -- it is still less than -----
40
41 MR. JUSTICE BELL: No, do not ask it, please. If I can do a
42 simple sum, there is absolutely no need to put it to a
43 witness,
44
45 MR. MORRIS: Your evidence is that you only remember two or
46 three people given authorisation to stay with paid breaks
47 in the Colchester store?
48 A. My recollection is there were two, three people, at
49 most, who wanted to stay with paid breaks, yes.
50
51 Q. Presumably, all the others positively wanted a pay cut, did
52 they?
53 A. This is what I cannot understand. I remember people
54 being quite positive about it, because, initially,
55 I remember there was an advantage to taking the pay rise,
56 else nobody would have taken it. They were definitely
57 given the choice and they were definitely allowed to make
58 some sort of decision. So, the way you are doing your
59 calculation does not, standing here, seem to add up. But,
60 you know, obviously the figures you are quoting to me