Day 143 - 27 Jun 95 - Page 15


     
     1        at least two of its employees had recently had automobile
     2        accidents as a result of falling asleep while driving home
     3        after working late shifts".  You cannot help us whether
     4        that was in that particular store or whether that was
     5        something in ----
     6        A.  The "defendant" refers to McDonald's and the management
     7        who would have been in Salem Oregon.  Salem, Oregon -----
     8
     9   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  No, just pause.  You see, the judgment --
    10        there may be other parts which are not -- says the
    11        "defendant" which is McDonald's -- it is McDonald's
    12        Restaurants of Oregon Incorporated, an Oregon Corporation.
    13        What is McDonald's Restaurants of Oregon?
    14        A.  The way it works, my Lord, is in each state generally
    15        the McOpco stores may very well be -- I am starting to give
    16        you some legal stuff, but I am not sure -- I believe they
    17        incorporate the McOpco's in that particular state, if you
    18        will.
    19
    20   Q.   So they are operating companies in each state ---
    21        A.  That is correct, my Lord.
    22
    23   Q.   -- essentially, are they?
    24        A.  Yes.
    25
    26   Q.   But all of which are subsidiaries of McDonald's
    27        Corporation?
    28        A.  Yes, my Lord.
    29
    30   Q.   So what 13 has said and what page 2 has said is that at
    31        least two of the McDonald's Oregon employees have recently
    32        had automobile accidents as a result of falling asleep
    33        while driving home after working late shifts, but it does
    34        not say whether they were employees at the same store or
    35        not.  Do you know any more about that?
    36        A.  No, that much detail, my Lord, I just do not know
    37        about.  I know that the Manager violated our rules.  This
    38        was being primarily handled by the Human Resource people in
    39        Oregon -- we have a regional office there -- and that swift
    40        action was taken against the Manager and appropriate
    41        communications took place so that everyone knew what we had
    42        done and why we had done it among our employees.  But that
    43        was long before this legal action, my Lord, and I was not
    44        involved in this legal action that you have in front of us.
    45
    46   MR. MORRIS:  If a Manager was sacked for violating McDonald's
    47        policy in, for example, Oregon, you would expect to know
    48        about that?
    49        A.  This is a very unusual situation.  I would not know
    50        about the average or typical, you know, for failing to do 
    51        their job up to the standards that we would want. 
    52        I generally would not know about those things.  But 
    53        something as serious as this, yes, I expect to know about
    54        it.
    55
    56   Q.   But you do not know that the recent two other cases, not
    57        only did you not hear about it but, presumably, the
    58        managers were not sacked for it -- the two other cases of
    59        people falling asleep at the wheel of a car?
    60        A.  I am not aware of that much detail in this thing.

Prev Next Index