Day 139 - 21 Jun 95 - Page 29
1 Q. Chicken McNuggetts?
2 A. You got it. It is an awfully important product for our
3 organisation.
4
5 Q. Nothing to do with your department, was it?
6 A. Excuse me?
7
8 Q. Nothing to do with your department?
9 A. It has to do with my department when there is a
10 secondary boycott that needs to be stopped.
11
12 Q. So, when you have to advise people on how to stop a
13 secondary boycott, you spend 80 per cent of the whole year
14 doing so?
15 A. If it is as important an issue that goes to the
16 wholesomeness of our food and is related to an union and a
17 secondary boycott situation, absolutely.
18
19 Q. I move on from that to the McDonald's management --
20 violations of child labour laws in McDonald's stores
21 in ---
22 A. Philadelphia?
23
24 Q. Thank you. I am trying to find it in your statement.
25 These violations were revealed by a state inspection; is
26 that how it came out?
27 A. Yes.
28
29 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Was it the city authorities that did it?
30 A. It would be the local authorities, my Lord.
31
32 MR. MORRIS: You said that he needed help to understand how the
33 system should work again -- I understood that is what you
34 said -- presumably, what some of the laws were, or what
35 some of the requirements were?
36 A. He asked us for help to sharpen up his practices and
37 what needed to be done.
38
39 Q. Was he violating the law knowingly?
40 A. No, sir, he was not.
41
42 Q. He did not know?
43 A. That is correct.
44
45 MR. JUSTICE BELL: What I understand is -- did you pronounce it
46 Mr. McCale -- he had these dozen stores for which he had
47 overall responsibility and which he ran overall, but
48 individually they would be run by employees?
49 A. A store manager.
50
51 Q. A store manager, employed by him or his company?
52 A. That is correct, my Lord; and he would oversee what
53 they do.
54
55 Q. But if there was any question of enforcement procedures --
56 that is, "Something has gone wrong, put it right", or
57 whatever -- from the local authority, it would be him or
58 his company, if he had a company which was a legal
59 personality, who would be the subject matter of the
60 procedures?