Day 123 - 09 May 95 - Page 08
1 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Yes.
2
3 MR. MORRIS: The point is, is there anything in the fact sheet
4 which you can recall that has not been said by somebody
5 before, whether it was in the 70s or the 80s; I am talking
6 about criticisms that have been made of McDonald's
7 Corporation.
8
9 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Then I think let Mr. Beavers see the fact
10 sheet. Remember his question, but the way I interpreted it
11 is you are being asked whether you can see in the section
12 towards the end which is headed: "What it's like working
13 for McDonald's". Do you have that?
14
15 MR. MORRIS: It really is the whole fact sheet, not just the
16 employment section. (To the witness): Is there anything
17 in there which -----
18
19 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Is there any criticism there which you have
20 not come across ---
21
22 MR. MORRIS: Before you took action?
23
24 MR. JUSTICE BELL: -- before you read this?
25
26 MR. MORRIS: Before, basically, 1990, is there anything in there
27 which has not been said by other people before?
28 A. I would say a good deal of it. I find it highly, you
29 know, inflammatory.
30
31 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I am not sure how far this helps without
32 being more precise, because, if we move away from the fact
33 sheet altogether, you could say something very critical of
34 someone, or publish something very critical of someone,
35 which had no foundation in fact at all, for instance, and
36 might well find that other people have said it, where would
37 that take one, I ask the rhetorical question?
38
39 You might put it in a summary form, if what you are really
40 saying is: Has it all been said before? If so, why decide
41 to sue on this leaflet?
42
43 MR. MORRIS: Yes. That is what I was going to say, really, is
44 the first part -----
45
46 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Do you remember from your reading of the
47 leaflet -- what we might do, if you feel at a disadvantage,
48 is to ask if you would be kind enough to read it through
49 again during the mid-day adjournment and Mr. Morris can ask
50 the question again after lunch, because you cannot be
51 expected to recall everything which is in the leaflet.
52 What he is really asking is, was there any criticism which
53 was new to you in there, turning it round the other way?
54 A. There were a few things. The first time I read this
55 was ---
56
57 Q. 1993?
58 A. -- before I testified, yes, 1993, before I testified
59 last year, and I can say that I was quite shocked at some
60 of the things that I read in this piece.