Day 115 - 06 Apr 95 - Page 23


     
     1        within sight of another, it means you must not use captive
     2        bolt pistol because it may very well kill, it is designed,
     3        maybe, to stun, but it is obvious that it may very well
     4        kill and I have heard expressions of view that it probably
     5        does in those cases, but you certainly would be taking, at
     6        the very least, considerable risk of actually killing a
     7        heifer if you used the captive bolt on it in the sight of
     8        another heifer, would you not?
     9        A.  Yes, and usually the stunning pen, I mentioned, was a
    10        pen like this with high sides so that the animal could not
    11        be seen.
    12
    13   Q.   I understand that.  Also the captive bolt pistol makes
    14        quite a noise whereas the stunning tongs do not.
    15
    16   MR. RAMPTON:  Notwithstanding all of which, Dr. Long, it is
    17        right, is it not, that in 1984 the Farm Animal Welfare
    18        Council recommended for cattle as well as pigs that all
    19        prohibitions on stunning animals in the presence of their
    20        fellows be lifted?
    21        A.  They recommended that, but I am not sure that it was
    22        implemented.
    23
    24   Q.   It has not been, so far as anybody knows, but that is
    25        right, is it not?
    26        A.  I think so, yes, without looking at that.
    27
    28   Q.   I can tell you the reference.  It is paragraph 80 on page
    29        22.  They recommended, however ----
    30        A.  This?
    31
    32   Q.   I do not know what it looks like in its original.  I have a
    33        photocopy.
    34        A.  Paragraph 80?
    35
    36   Q.   It is a passage in bold type in paragraph 80.
    37        A.  I see.  "We recommend that the law be changed to make a
    38        clear distinction" ----
    39
    40   Q.   That is right.
    41        A.  Yes, I know about those, and it is also interesting
    42        that the Scottish legislation, that was referring to some
    43        extent to the deer which I mentioned.  I myself when I have
    44        seen slaughtering, well, first of all, I am not sure that
    45        the law has been changed but when I have seen slaughtering
    46        in different animals, I must say that sometimes this is an
    47        advantage, according to the layout of the slaughterhouse,
    48        to do pigs quickly singularly and out of sight of one
    49        another, and on other occasions I have seen it where it has
    50        been done, and it appears that a bit of companionship in 
    51        their last moments does settle the pigs a bit.  I think it 
    52        is very empirical, and again I cannot say very much about 
    53        this again because my offer to go there was not taken up.
    54
    55   Q.   Did you notice what Mr. Bowes had to say about his new
    56        stunning equipment?
    57        A.  Was this the so-called fail-safe equipment?
    58
    59   Q.   Yes.
    60        A.  Yes.

Prev Next Index