Day 115 - 06 Apr 95 - Page 18


     
     1   MR. RAMPTON:  Do you accept that the therapeutic use of drugs to
     2        cure animals that are ill -- that is what therapeutic
     3        means, I think -- is a permissible practice?
     4        A.  Good husbandry would treat each animal individually.
     5        Mass medication which has to be undertaken in these
     6        conditions is bad medication and invites the danger of
     7        multiresistant organisms.
     8
     9   Q.   I do not think that is an answer to my question.  Do you
    10        agree or do you disagree with the therapeutic use of drugs
    11        for the treatment of illness in animals?
    12        A.  I agree with that use as advised by a caring vet.
    13
    14   Q.   I have another question:  Do you agree or disagree with
    15        preventative or prophylactic use of pharmaceuticals for the
    16        prevention of illness in animals at the time and only at
    17        the time of an outbreak of an epidemic or something
    18        similar?
    19        A.  That I regard only as a Fire Brigade operation.
    20        Obviously, if you have an epidemic on your hand you have
    21        got to do something urgently, but essentially you should
    22        cure the cause.  Therapy is a question of curing causes and
    23        not suppressing symptoms.  So, you should deal with the
    24        environment and the conditions the animals are reared so
    25        that they do not get these epidemics; the same goes for
    26        human beings.
    27
    28   Q.   If the use of antibiotics is restricted in the two ways
    29        that I have described, that is to say, therapy and
    30        prophylactic treatment on occasion of an outbreak not in
    31        general or routine use, what danger is there to human
    32        beings from those animals once they have been slaughtered?
    33        A.  Well, the danger is not just to the animals that have
    34        been slaughtered but the dangers of multiresistant
    35        organisms.  I have told you that pig flu, for example, is a
    36        very infectious disease.  It is also a zoonoses in some
    37        ways.  These bugs can get into the human condition.  So,
    38        the spread is more insidious.  That is why we are
    39        concerned.
    40
    41        At the moment, last week we heard again, the Veterinary
    42        Products Committee is having another meeting on this whole
    43        question of multiresistant, the development of
    44        multiresistant bugs.
    45
    46        So, I have two reservations about what I have in front of
    47        me.  One is that there may be a misunderstanding about the
    48        definition of the treatments, of what is an antibiotic and
    49        what is included in the feeds by compounders who Mr. Bowes
    50        may have very little control over.  Secondly, the use of 
    51        mass medication generally instead of clearing up the 
    52        essential problems.  I am expressing the reservations 
    53        because I have gone through this pretty carefully in a
    54        short space of time and I do not see a satisfactory answer
    55        to my reservations.
    56
    57   MR. RAMPTON:  I think, if I may say so, Dr. Long, your
    58        reservation is based on a number of assumptions for which
    59        there is no basis to be found in the evidence of Mr. Bowes,
    60        but I am not going to argue with you about it.  What I want

Prev Next Index