Day 114 - 04 Apr 95 - Page 20


     
     1        particularly vets, involved.
     2
     3        In some cases the slaughterhouse people and other people
     4        along the chain appointed their own officials who should
     5        act as, if you like, animal welfare officials.  But they
     6        were employed by the company.  This was associated at the
     7        time with the adoption of a scheme called HACCP.  You know
     8        about that.
     9
    10        That has meant there has now been more supervision one way
    11        and another by various officials doing various jobs.  They
    12        have really carried into effect some of the recommendations
    13        that animal welfare organisations such as FAWC have been
    14        asking for over the years.
    15
    16   Q.   Did that become more marked after this 1990 Act?
    17        A.  Yes, it was much more marked after that, and it began
    18        to be more marked in the late 1980s because I think
    19        actually the Richmond Report came out in probably 1988 or
    20        1989.
    21
    22   Q.   Page 41, it talks about sticking.  It says what you have
    23        already said:  "The object of sticking is to cut off the
    24        blood supply to the brain and it is critical that to
    25        achieve this with the minimum of delay the cut must be
    26        accurate"?
    27        A.  Just tell me which page, would you mind?
    28
    29   Q.   Sorry, the bottom of page 41.
    30        A.  Yes, I see.
    31
    32   Q.   Then it says:  "We are not satisfied that slaughtermen are
    33        aware of this necessity."   What do they mean by that, or
    34        what is your view on that?  Are slaughtermen aware of the
    35        necessity of speedy sticking?
    36        A.  Slaughtermens' knowledge of physiology, particularly
    37        the brain, is pretty limited, very limited, I would say.
    38        They know that you have to bleed the animal out.  There is
    39        a good deal of confusion in this matter of bleeding out
    40        because, if you take an animal that is shot or shot in the
    41        wild, you would kill it first and then bleed it out.  But
    42        the ritual in the meat industry is that you have to bleed
    43        it out while the heart is still pumping, and you bleed out
    44        most of the blood that way.  But you do not have to do it
    45        that way.  You can still get as much blood, or nearly as
    46        much blood, out by killing it outright first of all and
    47        then bleeding it, and it will drain out even though the
    48        animal is dead.
    49
    50        But in the trade there is a good deal of resistance for 
    51        what is called stun killing which is both stunning and 
    52        killing in one shock, one hefty shock.  You want me to talk 
    53        about cattle, well, that does apply to cattle but does
    54        apply to other species as well, particularly pigs.
    55
    56   Q.   On page 45, point 183 -- we are nearly through this now --
    57        talking about casualty animals, "... current provisions ...
    58        are both confusing and inadequate".  It has been put to
    59        them, and they concluded, that the situation is indeed
    60        unsatisfactory.  You have expressed something about

Prev Next Index