Day 114 - 04 Apr 95 - Page 11
1 operators." What is your view on the modern purpose built
2 premises; do you agree with their analysis?
3 A. There are shortcomings.
4
5 Q. Pardon?
6 A. There are still shortcomings.
7
8 Q. Is that in all of them or in some of them?
9 A. Every new one seems to have some shortcomings. They
10 vary, the different sorts of shortcomings, but the
11 recommendations from the government on -- since this
12 document was prepared -- I think you probably have a copy
13 of another document on the design and running of
14 slaughterhouses, and there are still problems.
15
16 Q. On point 26 at the bottom of page 9: "We believe that
17 welfare needs are not adequately taken into account in the
18 granting of licences/registrations of slaughterhouses."
19 What is your experience? Are welfare considerations taken
20 into account or has it got better or worse over the years?
21 A. Those shortcomings refer, I would think, primarily to
22 the licensing and training of slaughtermen and what action
23 is taken if they are accused, for instance, of cruelty to
24 animals in other respects, as to whether their licences are
25 taken away, whether their licences are restricted in one
26 area to one species of animal.
27
28 Q. Is it true that welfare needs are not adequately taken into
29 account when the licences and registrations are granted?
30 A. They certainly would not satisfy me.
31
32 Q. Even now?
33 A. No.
34
35 Q. Why would they not satisfy you now?
36 A. There is insufficient training in animal behaviour and
37 handling animals.
38
39 Q. Yes, I think this report refers to that a bit later on.
40 Then the last point over the page on page 10, the last
41 sentence says: "All too often it appeared that investment
42 in slaughterhouse improvements had been geared solely to
43 increasing throughput and profitability." What is your
44 view on that?
45 A. I would say that animal welfare has now become a
46 marketing issue, if you like. There is a -- you can charge
47 a premium for certain things, so that although that
48 statement was undoubtedly true in 1984, other factors have
49 come in and investment in slaughterhouses, although
50 predominantly aimed at increasing throughput, that
51 throughput has also to cater for niche markets, if you
52 like. So, the statement could be modified slightly as a
53 result of the activities, particularly, of animal
54 welfarists. That has been adopted to some extent. I mean,
55 some action has been taken on the basis of this report.
56
57 Q. Welfare of animals being a profitable factor in some market
58 niches, when did that really start having any significant
59 effect?
60 A. I suppose I would say during the early 1980s. It was