Day 114 - 04 Apr 95 - Page 06
1 based on what they have seen, in fact. So, I am not quite
2 sure why you said you see it as a statement of fact because
3 it is -- I am not saying there are no facts in it because
4 obviously there are, but just why ------
5
6 MR. JUSTICE BELL: But you want the fact as well as the
7 opinion?
8
9 MS. STEEL: Yes.
10
11 MR. JUSTICE BELL: You want his evidence of fact? Mr. Long is a
12 witness of the fact.
13
14 MS. STEEL: Yes.
15
16 MR. JUSTICE BELL: It is just Mr. Morris seemed to be suggesting
17 that he was an expert witness and not a witness of fact.
18
19 MS. STEEL: No, I am not asking about that. I understand that.
20 No, I just did not understand why you thought it was
21 predominantly fact rather than expertise.
22
23 MR. JUSTICE BELL: You may urge me that is wrong but that is how
24 I saw it when I first went through, because most of the
25 things in his statement are averments of fact rather than
26 expressions of opinion arising from the fact. It may that
27 be his evidence has taken a slightly different course, but
28 if you read through his statement, that is the way it
29 reads. It does not matter.
30
31 MS. STEEL: I am not sure how that is different to other
32 experts, though.
33
34 MR. JUSTICE BELL: It is not necessarily, it just depends; some
35 expert witnesses make no averments of fact whatsoever.
36 They say: "If you find the facts of the matter to be this,
37 then, in my opinion, the conclusion to be drawn would be
38 that."
39
40 MR. MORRIS: Is it possible that -- I understand that
41 Mr. Rampton would like some time to -----
42
43 MR. JUSTICE BELL: What I do want you to do, whatever decision
44 I make in a moment, is to take this on board. I appreciate
45 that one may be so busy that one gets distracted from the
46 course of what you should do. But, for instance,
47 disclosure of a document which is relevant must be prompt
48 if it comes into your possession. The moment, for
49 instance, you knew of the existence of the document which
50 you could get hold of and had reason to believe that it was
51 the document referred to in the leaflet as a recent British
52 government report, it was disclosable.
53
54 You might have preferred to read it before you disclosed
55 it, but it was disclosable immediately, do you understand,
56 for better or worse?
57
58 MR. MORRIS: Yes, I only got it yesterday. I did not even look
59 at the cover until I got home because Dr. Long gave it to
60 us in the morning.