Day 113 - 03 Apr 95 - Page 27


     
     1        had it in the calves recently with serotype, phagetype
     2        actually, 204.
     3
     4        Now what we are getting is something happening in cattle,
     5        again older cattle, another multiresistant organism which
     6        is causing lot of problems, and that is another salmonella
     7        typhimurium, which is No. DT 104.  These are signs of
     8        marketing, mixing animals and giving them stresses like,
     9        imposing stresses on them like marketing and transport,
    10        that they spread these diseases.
    11
    12        In the 1960s, the Public Health Laboratory Service was so
    13        concerned about this that they brought in recommendations
    14        that were put forth by what was called the Swan Committee
    15        which actually reported in probably 1969 or 1970.  Various
    16        restrictions -- they tried to place various restrictions on
    17        the misuse of antibiotics in farming.  Those were mostly
    18        circumvented, but now we have still got the same old
    19        problem recurring but with slightly different forms of
    20        bacteria.  Those are, I would say, indicators of undue
    21        stress and bad husbandry.
    22
    23   Q.   I was going to come on to sort of diseases and possible
    24        transmissibility when you have dealt with the general
    25        welfare matters.  I think we have dealt with markets.  In
    26        transport, are there any concerns about the physical
    27        vibrations or bumpiness or whatever of being in a lorry,
    28        confined in a lorry?
    29        A.  Yes.  You think about animals falling -- as I have
    30        said, cattle tend to stand up.  Now a cattle animal that is
    31        content and happy will normally lie down and cud.  If it is
    32        not cudding for a large part of the time, you have a
    33        welfare problem; you wonder why.  So, one thinks that they
    34        are apprehensive.  There is, obviously, if they fall down
    35        they hurt one another, and there is a question of how tight
    36        you should pack them in because, in a way, if they are
    37        fairly tight, they hold one another up.  But, on the other
    38        hand, if they are very tight there is a welfare problem if
    39        one goes down.
    40
    41        In two tier lorries -- some of the animals go in two tier
    42        lorries, the smaller animals -- you get excreta coming from
    43        up the top in the old-fashion type of vehicle which would
    44        affect those down below.  You also have to think of the
    45        temperature.  If the journey is a long one, on a very hot
    46        day, the animals are producing a lot of heat and a lot of
    47        moisture.  You have to think of the vehicles and the design
    48        of the vehicles, as to whether they are adequately
    49        ventilated and whether the temperature control is adequate.
    50 
    51        So, in a good, well-run system, one should have a recorder 
    52        like a tachograph on the lorry to see how long it has been 
    53        on the journey, what the humidity and the temperature is
    54        where the animals are.  A lorry nowadays should have,
    55        instead of the ramps, it should have a sort of forklift ---
    56
    57   Q.   Hydraulic?
    58        A.  -- hydraulic platform so that the animals can be lifted
    59        up and down without them going up slopes.  Also, where the
    60        vehicles dock which is not all that -----

Prev Next Index