Day 109 - 28 Mar 95 - Page 16


     
     1   MR. RAMPTON:  My Lord, it is British Poultry Science (1986)
     2        received for publication 16th April 1985.
     3
     4   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Is it in the same section?
     5
     6   MR. RAMPTON:  No, it is in tab L.  It is a single paper by
     7        itself.  Again, by Gregory and Wotton.
     8
     9   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Thank you.
    10
    11   THE WITNESS:  Just page 203, the end of the first paragraph.  It
    12        draws attention to the fact that, "Severing the spinal cord
    13        is probably the neck cutting method of choice in many
    14        processing plants because it facilitates feather release at
    15        plucking", which I think shows that some poultry slaughter
    16        is putting economic considerations well in advance of
    17        humane considerations but that there is a law intended to
    18        protect poultry.  That is my observation, the last one.
    19
    20   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Do you think you have finished virtually?
    21
    22   MS. STEEL:  I have a few things to go over, not on slaughter.
    23        I do not know if there is anything that Mrs. Druce wanted
    24        to add?
    25
    26   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I wondered why you were pausing.  If you were
    27        pausing because you were not sure whether you had anything
    28        more to ask, I would have the break now.  What I suggest is
    29        you ask the matters you do have in mind, then we will have
    30        the five minute break.
    31
    32   MS. STEEL:  Right.  I paused because the last time I looked up
    33        you were writing and then I forgot to look again.
    34
    35   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  It is very considerate of you, but I will ask
    36        you to stop if I need you to.
    37
    38   MS. STEEL:  (To the witness) Is there anything else on slaughter
    39        you wanted to add apart from that?  I am not expecting you
    40        to.
    41        A.  No, merely that it does disturb me that decapitation is
    42        the final welfare insult to birds who have missed every
    43        single correct part of the procedure, and that there did
    44        seem to be a sort of measurable number of birds that were
    45        missing the stunner at Sun Valley and missing everything
    46        else.  I would think that probably a hand held stunner at
    47        that stage would be far preferable to decapitation.
    48
    49   Q.   Is that something that is available?
    50        A.  Yes.  People that rear on a farm and slaughter on a 
    51        farm -- this happens, for instance, for the Christmas trade 
    52         -- that is used, yes. 
    53
    54   Q.   While we have this file open, at tab G on page ----
    55
    56   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Does a hand held stunner cause cardiac
    57        arrest?
    58        A.  I think it will depend on how it is set.  I think it
    59        can, yes, but it would cause -- I mean, you would need a
    60        back up knife obviously as well, yes.

Prev Next Index