Day 108 - 27 Mar 95 - Page 33
1 just see it anyway rather than showing it in advance.
2
3 MR. RAMPTON: Given the experience of this, lack of it, I should
4 say, I do not think there is really anything controversial
5 about it. I do, however, wish that documents, videos or
6 other documents, which are in the possession of a so-called
7 expert who has had a statement in the file since July of
8 last year or the year before could be disclosed in
9 reasonable time before the witness is here and, indeed,
10 before my witnesses are called.
11
12 MS. STEEL: I am sorry.
13
14 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Yes, due apology was given. I think the best
15 thing is if I just see it through anyway.
16
17 MS. STEEL: Are you happy for it?
18 A. Yes, there is one mistake in it which I will -----
19
20 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Tell me about that now?
21 A. It says "genetic engineeering" which it is not, it was
22 genetic selection. That was before I was aware of that, I
23 am afraid.
24
25 MS. STEEL: When was this video made?
26 A. I think 1986, I am not totally sure, but that sort of
27 time.
28
29 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Do you mind, Mrs. Brindley-Codd, operating it
30 again?
31 A. Some of the quality is not perfect because we did it on
32 the cheap.
33
34 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Let us see it first. Would you like to come
35 and sit down at the front again?
36
37 (Video recording played)
38
39 MS. STEEL: The chickens that were shown at the end of that and
40 also throughout, but on the blue material, on whatever it
41 was, that were used to compare, where were those chickens
42 from?
43 A. I think those came from a slaughter house in South
44 Yorkshire.
45
46 Q. Do you know where they have been reared?
47 A. I think, yes, it was attached to the slaughter house.
48 It was a complex, I think -----
49
50 Q. A commercial broiler?
51 A. Yes, a commercial broiler unit, yes.
52
53 Q. Although I think it was on the film, why do you think the
54 birds that you reared from chicks were 25 per cent lighter
55 than their commercially reared counterparts?
56 A. Well, they had no growth promoters and it has been very
57 hard to find, in fact, impossible to find out what is the
58 expected additional growth from the growth promoters. I
59 have heard very varying stories. So, obviously, it was
60 partly to do with that or if they were not efficient they