Day 108 - 27 Mar 95 - Page 21


     
     1        very important one and we welcome that of course, and there
     2        were minor tinkerings, I would call it, but I do not think
     3        that it was likely to change anything very radically and we
     4        thought that the timescale given was too long since, for
     5        instance, leg weakness has been recognised fully since, let
     6        us say in 1980 I can remember a Ministry document on that
     7        as long ago as that, so it is not a new problem.
     8
     9   Q.   Was there any response to the concerns raised about the
    10        number of inspections by MAFF their powers?
    11        A.  I do not think that was part of the -- I mean we are
    12        always raising this and we have run petitions years ago
    13        about the fact that they give warning and in fact there has
    14        been a kind of vague impression given that this is less
    15        common but I think that it is the same. I think they are
    16        reluctant to waste time turning up at a farm where the
    17        farmer might not actually be there but, in my opinion, one
    18        spot check is probably worth 20 inspections when you have
    19        given prior warning and I think, for instance, training
    20        standard officials do not give prior warning.  I can see no
    21        reason, apart from this fact of the farmer having to be in,
    22        but most farmers are in.  Very often somebody can be found
    23        and if not, they could go to the next farm.
    24
    25   Q.   Is that the reason that the MAFF officials have given for
    26        not making on spot checks?
    27        A.  Yes, that has been the reason every time.
    28
    29   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  What are the particular ways in which a
    30        battery farm can be improved once a farmer knows MAFF is
    31        coming?  I understand picking up the deads birds?
    32        A.  That would be a fairly important thing, yes.
    33
    34   Q.   Do you have other matters in mind?
    35        A.  They would check on the equipment, I suppose, the
    36        feeders and the water.  Sometimes the water gets cut off by
    37        mistake and perhaps only one drinker would be functioning
    38        instead of two in cage, that type of thing.  They would be
    39        able to check on all that type of thing.  They would be the
    40        main things, I think, or repairing cages, because it would
    41        be frowned on if cages were -- sometimes you quite often
    42        see loose birds living in the deep fit underneath in
    43        battery units and they have escaped, so that is clearly not
    44        to be desired and they may do some repairs in that day or
    45        two.
    46
    47        Also may I just add that sometimes the droppings are piled
    48        up so high that they actually reach the feet of the birds
    49        in the cages which of course makes the whole point of the
    50        battery system pointless and that could be remedied in the 
    51        course of two days. 
    52 
    53   MS. STEEL:  The chickens that you have bought, have you been
    54        able to restore them to good condition?
    55        A.  Yes.  I think without exception, apart from the one
    56        with the rotting eggs in her abdomen, which obviously she
    57        had to be put down, otherwise we have, I think in every
    58        single case, restored them for a while, though it has been
    59        a feature of them that they perhaps died after a year or
    60        two and very often from tumours I have had them put down by

Prev Next Index