Day 108 - 27 Mar 95 - Page 14
1 also going, even if you have not got a formal
2 qualification, it is also through studying scientific
3 literature and the available information produced both by
4 the industry and the other welfare bodies.
5
6 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I think I should see the film because
7 I cannot possibly reach a view about it, and my inclination
8 would be to let you go ahead anyway. Whether at the end of
9 the day I think the film has a status which enables to help
10 me, or whether it turns out that it is just a vivid
11 illustration of some point which Mrs. Druce wants to make,
12 I will have to wait and see.
13
14 MR. RAMPTON: That may be different. Again, it is not a
15 technical objection. Your Lordship will make up your
16 Lordship's mind at the end of the case whether it has any
17 value of evidence. In my submission, at the moment, it
18 plainly does not. The real question is this, if the
19 Defendants are intending to rely on the contents of this
20 film, which are not made by Mrs. Druce, as opposed to the
21 evidence which Mrs. Druce herself can give your Lordship
22 from her own direct experience or learning, then they would
23 need to, as it were, constitute this as evidence either by
24 but putting a Civil Evidence Act notice on it, in which
25 case I shall immediately serve a counter notice or by
26 calling the people who made it to testify.
27
28 MS. STEEL: It is not as opposed to, it is in support of the
29 evidence that she also -----
30
31 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I think I ought to see the film. You can ask
32 Mrs. Druce questions about it. What you should not assume
33 is that because I have heard someone who may have
34 particular qualifications say something on the sound track
35 of the video, I am taking that as evidence, do you
36 understand?
37
38 MS. STEEL: Yes, okay. Can it be shown on the large video
39 please.
40
41 MR. JUSTICE BELL: How long does it take?
42
43 MR. RAMPTON: 33 minutes.
44
45 MR. JUSTICE BELL: 33?
46
47 MR. RAMPTON: Yes.
48
49 MS. STEEL: While it is being set up there was one thing I was
50 going to ask. Although your statement says you have been
51 gathering information on the broiler industry since 1984,
52 prior to that time, have you had any dealings with poultry
53 and, if so, can you explain what they were?
54 A. Well, prior to 1984 it was solely the battery hen and
55 I bought many and reared them in my own garden.
56
57 Q. Your experience of the poultry industry goes back ----
58
59 MR. JUSTICE BELL: You are saying batteries predominantly since
60 the 1970s and then while that, no doubt, has continued,