Day 106 - 23 Mar 95 - Page 06
1 define the terms, and it can be quite important. If you
2 like to think in terms of a large group of diseases which
3 are conveyed to the human being by food, those are
4 generally termed as food-borne diseases. Within that
5 larger group, there is a specific smaller group of diseases
6 which are defined specifically as food poisoning.
7
8 The distinctions can be to an extent arbitrary, but the
9 general specific identifier for food poisoning is that a
10 large dose of the micro-organism concerned or its toxin is
11 required to cause illness. In general, the incubation
12 period is short, and again in general the symptoms tend to
13 be confined to the classic gastroenteritis, i.e. diarrhoea
14 vomiting, stomach pains and associated disorders.
15
16 Now, the distinction is quite important in terms of
17 control, because it is generally taken that the initial
18 dose in foods tend to be small and, therefore, a
19 prerequisite for food poisoning is usually considered to be
20 multiplication of the organism within the food once it is
21 contaminated, as distinct from the separate classic
22 food-borne diseases which are generally -- and I do stress
23 generally -- low dose do not require multiplication in
24 food, and can give a variety of illness effects, classic
25 diseases, can include things like typhoid, cholera,
26 brucellosis and campylobacter enteritis.
27
28 MR. MORRIS: Does that also apply for E.coli 0157?
29 A. E.coli would be better classified as a food-borne
30 disease. It is not a classic food poisoning in the sense
31 that it is almost certainly a low dose infection, i.e. does
32 not need multiplication within the food.
33
34 Q. So the whole thing is like a very grey area in terms of
35 scientific definition?
36 A. It is the classic philosophical argument, how many
37 angels can dance on the tip of a needle, whatever; it tends
38 towards the arbitrary at times.
39
40 MR. JUSTICE BELL: So you are putting typhoid, campylobacter and
41 E.coli in the second category?
42 A. In the major category of food-borne diseases; whereas
43 things like salmonella -----
44
45 MR. JUSTICE BELL: But not within the smaller food poisoning
46 category?
47 A. Quite so.
48
49 Q. Just pause a minute, please. Which side does salmonella
50 come in?
51 A. Salmonella is the classic food poisoning.
52
53 MR. MORRIS: But leaving aside the scientific debate and
54 specifications, would it be fair to say that food poisoning
55 colloquially describes that whole area of food-borne
56 disease carried to humans?
57 A. In common parlance, the term "food poisoning" is used
58 more than "food-borne".
59
60 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I think Mr. Morris has got anxious that some