Day 100 - 09 Mar 95 - Page 12


     
     1
     2   Q.   No?
     3        A.  No, foreign objects are the vast majority of the
     4        complaints that we get.
     5
     6   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  All this -- may I just pause -- depends,
     7        first of all, upon the customer seeing fit to complain?
     8        A.  That is right, yes.
     9
    10   Q.   Then it depends upon the person to whom they complain
    11        seeing fit to pass it down the line?
    12        A.  That is right.  If the complaint is handled in a
    13        professional manner in the restaurant, we should still get
    14        to hear about it by way of a reporting system, but it would
    15        say this complaint was handled in the restaurant and -----
    16
    17   Q.   But if someone walked back to the counter in a perfectly
    18        friendly manner and says:  "I think this is a bit
    19        under-cooked", and maybe in a typical English
    20        under-statement if they do so, and a cheerful crew member
    21        says:  "Oops, sorry about that", and gives them
    22        another  ---
    23        A.  We would not get to hear about that.
    24
    25   Q.   -- human nature being what it is, that might well be the
    26        end of that?
    27        A.  That is true, yes.
    28
    29   Q.   Then you would not know about it; it would not go into any
    30        kind of record count or anything else?
    31        A.  The official line is that any such complaint should be
    32        reported, but I suspect you are right.  In a number of
    33        instances, if it is successfully handled at the store, then
    34        we would not get to find out about it.
    35
    36   MS. STEEL:   You also get custom complaints of food poisoning?
    37        A.  There are occasional complaints of food poisoning, yes.
    38
    39   Q.   Those complaints are all fully investigated?
    40        A.  Yes, if we get -- there are two different types,
    41        perhaps I will take them separately, where a customer will
    42        say:  "I have food poisoning" and there is no evidence to
    43        the fact that she actually or he or she actually did have
    44        food poisoning, or that it was McDonald's food that was
    45        responsible for that.  Those would be reported through and
    46        they are logged on the computer.  Obviously, the customer
    47        is responded to, but we look at the reports -- sorry, we
    48        look at the reports drawn off the computer to see if there
    49        is any trend.
    50 
    51        For instance, if we had three complaints from the same 
    52        restaurant on the same day, then we would have to 
    53        investigate that and feel that there was a problem there,
    54        but I have never been aware of a case where that has
    55        happened.  They are all individual people that, quite
    56        possibly, have had food poisoning and have eaten in
    57        McDonald's restaurants before that and assumed that it is
    58        McDonald's.  That is one instance where there is no actual
    59        proof.
    60

Prev Next Index