Day 097 - 06 Mar 95 - Page 12
1 witness for that period and that other tail end topics are
2 fitted in around him.
3
4 My Lord, the gloomy picture I have is this, that if all the
5 employment evidence is to be given, that is to say, that
6 the Defendants do in truth call all their employment
7 witnesses with the result that I have to call all of mine,
8 the Plaintiffs will not finish their employment evidence
9 until the end of July. The reason for that is this. They
10 have some general employment witnesses like Mr. Stein, Jill
11 Barnes, the expert Mr. Purslow, four or five of those, but
12 then that is followed by 16 witnesses from the Plaintiffs
13 on specific allegations arising out of the Defendants'
14 witness statements or industrial tribunal papers.
15
16 Even allowing but two days for each of those, that makes 32
17 days hearing which takes one from about 20th June through
18 to 31st July.
19
20 MR. JUSTICE BELL: But is it really anticipated that they will
21 take two days each?
22
23 MR. RAMPTON: My Lord, one only has to look at what I might call
24 the nits which are picked in a number of the Defendants'
25 witness statements to understand that if I have to meet
26 those allegations in advance, then it may well be. One has
27 seen -- I use the word advisedly -- to one's chagrin how
28 long it takes for the Defendants to cross-examine
29 witnesses. I do not know, that may be one of the reasons
30 why Ms. Steel is labouring a bit with the case because she
31 feels -- I cannot do anything to prevent it -- and Mr.
32 Morris obviously feels that they have to go through every
33 single possible thing which, of course, is not so -- there
34 it is; that is what they think about it -- which is why
35 I thought it unwise to allow less than two days for each of
36 our 16 witnesses who deal with specific matters.
37
38 Of course, if the other side were represented, I would be
39 saying and expecting to agree with my opponent, and one
40 would be doing maybe two, may be one-and-a-half, witnesses
41 per day on matters of that kind.
42
43 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I have had a brief look again at the
44 employment witnesses. It is some time since I have read
45 them all through. I think what I will have to do is try to
46 set time aside to read them all through again. But where
47 they are individuals speaking of their own individual
48 experience and you are responding to that, the
49 cross-examination is to be directed at really those
50 specific events. They are a rather different category of
51 witness to the person who is speaking about what generally
52 happens, as it were.
53
54 MR. RAMPTON: In some case that is right. If there is a
55 specific event where the manager is alleged to have been
56 bossy or something, or there has been a puddle of water on
57 the floor, yes, that is right, but some of them are rather
58 more general than that, I am afraid. They will have to be
59 met by sometimes two or three witnesses from the Plaintiffs
60 who were dealing with that particular restaurant at the