Day 097 - 06 Mar 95 - Page 09
1 if your Lordship thought we should not sit for those three
2 days.
3
4 I hope your Lordship will understand if, when we make an
5 enquiry, your Lordship having indicated a desire not to sit
6 on those three days, he should come back to us and say:
7 "Well, I am sorry, I just cannot come any earlier".
8
9 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I have purposely said I am not deciding the
10 matter because I want to have all the relevant information
11 before I do. You wanted to say -- we will come back
12 actually to -- do we want to stay on scheduling or go on to
13 the other matters, first of all? I am quite keen to hear
14 as much as I can hear about scheduling ---
15
16 MR. RAMPTON: I have more to say about that.
17
18 MR. JUSTICE BELL: -- and various matters in the distant future,
19 apart from anything else.
20
21 MR. RAMPTON: I will say more. Mr. Morris wants to make an
22 interjection so I will sit down.
23
24 MR. MORRIS: First of all, we objected to the Plaintiffs
25 formalising or going ahead with the three days with
26 Mr. Beavers. We said we thought it should be scheduled for
27 five days. This was only about two or three weeks ago when
28 they raised it. He has only been in court for half a day
29 for a start -- and you can check that, the Plaintiffs can
30 check that.
31
32 Secondly, the matters of accidents and environment/index.html">litter: Litter,
33 I think we questioned him about. The accidents and the
34 whole issue of employment was not finished with
35 Mr. Beavers. He has been portrayed as an employment
36 witness and there may be quite substantial questioning on
37 that. The matter of publication and the action as a whole,
38 he is in the same position as Mr. Preston, in that we are
39 entitled to question him about a number of matters. We
40 cannot guarantee that that would all be completed in three
41 days with any re-examination as well.
42
43 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Can I just say this? I am not necessarily
44 saying it in relation to Mr. Beavers. I do not know
45 whether you have actually read the Lord Chief Justice's
46 practice direction which came out about two or three weeks
47 ago which refers to judges' powers to set time limits? So,
48 it is not just a question of what you can guarantee; it is
49 a question of what I will allow.
50
51 I have made it only too clear that I am extremely reluctant
52 to put time limits on you. I would prefer, if I do think
53 that longer has been taken than is necessary, to persuade
54 you what you can reasonably benefit from asking and what
55 you cannot, but there is that aspect as well. I do not
56 want to make too much of it because I hope it never comes
57 to it.
58
59 MR. MORRIS: Right. We had applied before Christmas or
60 immediately afterwards for a substantial break.