Day 091 - 17 Feb 95 - Page 04
1 enquiries of the Defendants' witnesses whether they are
2 actually going to come to court. Unhappily, and arguably
3 in breach of the rules, only three out of something like 31
4 of the Defendants' witness statements on that topic has got
5 an address on it at all, so we cannot write to them and we
6 cannot telephone them.
7
8 What I would ask your Lordship to do is order the
9 Defendants to supply the addresses and telephone numbers in
10 good time so that we can make our own enquiries.
11
12 MS. STEEL: This matter has some history actually but, firstly,
13 I think the Plaintiffs should say what the name of the
14 person is who they have referred to so that we are in a
15 position to rebut that if that is the case.
16
17 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I do not want to get involved in the argument
18 now. I just wanted to know what the ----
19
20 MS. STEEL: The other thing I wanted to mention was that -----
21
22 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Just pause a moment, let me make a note. So,
23 you are not suggesting that in relation to that body of
24 witnesses the normal order should be reversed and they
25 should go first?
26
27 MR. RAMPTON: No, my Lord. Can I keep that in reserve? What
28 I would like to do is what any litigant will normally be
29 able to do because the witness statement must have the
30 address on it. We would like to be able to make our own
31 enquiries of these people -- there is no property in
32 witnesses -- and to ask them.
33
34 If we cannot find them because there is not time or because
35 we cannot find them, then I may come back to your Lordship
36 and invite your Lordship to say that, in those
37 circumstances, the Defendants' witnesses on those specific
38 issues detailed complaints in various places over a period
39 of time, those witnesses should go first and I should be
40 allowed to call rebuttal evidence if and as necessary.
41
42 MS. STEEL: My Lord, what I wanted to say is that Mr. Rampton is
43 actually wrong. We made an application not to disclose the
44 addresses and phone numbers of our witnesses in front of
45 Sir Michael Davies on the grounds that we were worried that
46 they would be intimidated by the Plaintiffs into not coming
47 into court to give evidence. The Plaintiffs did not object
48 to that order being made and that is the position. If we
49 are going to take this further, obviously, I need to get
50 the paper work for that and the relevant order, but that is
51 definitely what happened.
52
53 Perhaps Mr. Rampton does not know about that because
54 Mr. Shields was dealing with the case at that time.
55
56 MR. MORRIS: We did say at that hearing that one of our
57 witnesses felt pressurised, and it may be the same person
58 that the Plaintiffs have just raised was a female person.
59 In the light of that and other things that can be gone into
60 later, we would take an extremely protective and strong