Day 090 - 16 Feb 95 - Page 03
1 I understand, represents the results of the tests done on
2 the raw material as it arrives at the processing plant in
3 France.
4
5 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Yes.
6
7 MR. RAMPTON: My Lord, the next bunch of sheets which has a
8 different file number because it relates to rearing and
9 slaughter and not to food safety is a day's checks done by
10 Sun Valley in Hereford on the whole process in the factory
11 up to the point where the product is divided according to
12 its destination. In other words, these documents are
13 common to the whole process. There comes a point when the
14 product which is destined for McDonald's or for the
15 supermarket gets divided. That is the point at which the
16 French documents, if I may put it like that, take over the
17 story.
18
19 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Yes.
20
21 MR. RAMPTON: My Lord, the other thing your Lordship asked us to
22 try to find was a microbiological summary for a convenient
23 month as early back in history as we could, a
24 microbiological summary, similar to the one your Lordship
25 sees for August. That we have not been able to find, but
26 I am surprised at the fuss that was made about our failure,
27 supposed failure, of discovery yesterday, because if one
28 looks, first of all, at tab 8 in volume pink VIII, one
29 finds (and I drew attention to it yesterday while
30 Dr. Pattison was giving evidence) these are not monthly
31 summaries, these are weekly summaries, a microbiological
32 summary for a week in 1989, for a week in 1990, those are
33 the first two documents, then in more legible form a
34 similar document for a week in May of 1993 and then,
35 finally, in that tab there is one for a second week in
36 1990. A better copy of the last of those summaries which
37 is the week commencing 25th November 1990 is to be found at
38 appendix 5 to Mr. Keith Kenny's statement which is in
39 volume yellow VII at tab 1.
40
41 So, in effect, what one has there are four sample weekly
42 summaries. They are not proformas. They have been filled
43 in for 1989, two in 1990 and one in 1993. It may be that
44 in those circumstances your Lordship will think that is the
45 extent of our obligation.
46
47 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I think what I will do is I will hear
48 cross-examination, anything the Defendants wish to put to
49 me on it. When you are cross-examining -- is there
50 anything more you want to say, Mr. Rampton?
51
52 MR. RAMPTON: No, my Lord, unless anybody at this stage wants
53 any help with the French but perhaps that is best left for
54 the moment.
55
56 MR. JUSTICE BELL: No. When you are cross-examining it would
57 help me, if there is going to be any issue as to discovery,
58 if you would actually put to the witness what, if anything,
59 you challenge in the witness's evidence and if you raise
60 any question of discovery, if you would do your very best