Day 065 - 09 Dec 94 - Page 64


     
     1        complete tatters if they gave weight to their client's
     2        vested interest?
     3        A.  I think it would be for MORI to do that.  MORI
     4        certainly do not do that.
     5
     6   Q.   Nobody would think of employing a bunch of academics at
     7        Leeds University to carry-out a piece of research if they
     8        thought that every time the research came out people were
     9        going to say, "Well, you cannot believe a word of this
    10        because so and so has paid for it"?
    11        A.  Whether it is a question of who has paid for it or what
    12        are the serious flaws in it, then there are serious
    13        criticisms that can be made of this research.
    14
    15   Q.   Tell us what they are, please?
    16        A.  One of the major criticisms that has been levelled
    17        about this research is it relies on family members being
    18        able to articulate their views and beliefs about
    19        decision-making and food choices.
    20
    21   Q.   Can you say that again?  I did not catch it.
    22        A.  The technique that was used in this particular study
    23        relied on family members being able to articulate their
    24        views and beliefs about decision-making around food.
    25
    26   Q.   Can you pause there?  The criticism is that it relied on
    27        family members being able to articulate their views and
    28        beliefs about decisions around food; is that right?
    29        A.  Yes.
    30
    31   Q.   Pause there.
    32        A.  If I can go on?
    33
    34   Q.   No, please, that is one -----
    35
    36   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Just pause; everyone is talking at once.
    37
    38   MR. RAMPTON:  If you want to add something afterwards.
    39
    40   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Just pause, please.
    41
    42   MR. RAMPTON:  Is that in itself a criticism of the way this
    43        research has been conducted?
    44        A.  What I was going on to say is that this is a technique
    45        which may be fine as far as it goes, but the problem with
    46        this kind of technique is it does have severe limitations.
    47
    48   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I think Ms. Dibb was going on to say why she
    49        thought that.
    50        A.  Yes, I was and I am happy to do that.  I am trying to 
    51        tell you why.  It has severe limitations because it will 
    52        not necessarily reflect behaviour.  It is what people 
    53        think.  Quite often, there is a huge difference between
    54        what people think they do and what they actually do will
    55        necessarily bring out influences about which respondents
    56        may be less cognisant.  Advertising is very much likely to
    57        be an influence about which respondents may be less
    58        cognisant.  When asked people like always to emphasise
    59        their automony.  They want to be seen and believed they are
    60        the people making decisions about their lives.  It is human

Prev Next Index