Day 064 - 08 Dec 94 - Page 31


     
     1   MS. STEEL:  Right.
     2
     3   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  -- because it is contested.  My recollection
     4        is there is some law on it and there may even have to be
     5        evidence as to the circumstances into which you came into
     6        possession of it and what your appreciation of its status
     7        was at the time.
     8
     9   MS. STEEL:  Can I also say that when we brought this up in the
    10        opening speech, Mr. Rampton actually got up and said that
    11        they had not disclosed it by accident and that it was not a
    12        problem.
    13
    14   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I am anxious not to prejudge it one way or
    15        the other.  All I am saying is we have obviously got to
    16        have a set piece argument about it.  The question is to
    17        what extent we can or cannot proceed with Mr. Oakley's
    18        cross-examination or, possibly, leave any further
    19        cross-examination if you are allowed to use the letters to
    20        some future time.
    21
    22   MR. RAMPTON:  I have a serious doubt whether it is anything
    23        about which Mr. Oakley will have a question to answer. I
    24        may be wrong about that.
    25
    26   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  But that may be a matter -- there are two
    27        stages, it seems to me, probably; first of all, whether you
    28        are allowed to use the documents at all or disclose any of
    29        their contents, and whether McDonald's are entitled to have
    30        them returned.  If you win on that first issue, there is
    31        then the question of whether you should be allowed to put
    32        them or anything in them in cross-examination to
    33        Mr. Oakley.
    34
    35        I cannot decide the second matter before I have decided the
    36        first.  It would be illogical to seek to do so.  What
    37        I suggest you do is continue with your cross-examination,
    38        apart from such part of it as must depend upon putting
    39        these letters or any part of them.  Mr. Rampton can
    40        re-examine.  Mr. Oakley can go.  When we have dealt with
    41        the question of the status of the letters we can reconsider
    42        the question of recall of Mr. Oakley if it is applicable.
    43
    44        What I am asking you to do, speaking figuratively, is to
    45        put a cordon sanitaire around these letters for the time
    46        being until we have had time to consider properly their
    47        status.
    48
    49   MS. STEEL:  OK.
    50 
    51   MR. MORRIS  (To the witness):  Just on the subject before we go 
    52        to a particular letter, is your recollection that that 
    53        there were four consignments of Brazilian beef of 20 tonnes
    54        each bought in the UK, a total of 80 tonnes?
    55        A.  No, I do not recollect the figure.
    56
    57   Q.   It would have been something like that, would it?
    58        A.  I do not know.
    59
    60   Q.   If we go to volume yellow XIV, Destruction of the

Prev Next Index